Weren't you critical of the OKs for not of them for not enough of them showing up last year?
Yeah, I was. But I had really considered the "why" they were showing up. In retrospect (and I don't remember exactly how I phrased it), I was wrong to be critical of them not appearing in Ferguson the first time.
Here's my thinking, in most other instances involving the OathKeepers, it clear who they are supporting. They rally to protect the citizenry from govt overreach. Are they doing this now? Who or what exactly are they protecting, and what do they bring to the table that those they are protecting can't provide themselves?