I'll agree with you and several others on the matter of questioning the wisdom of him being anywhere near there - but not his wisdom in being lawfully armed based on his assessment of risk. If I go to downtown Indianapolis, I am armed. My purposes there do not require a firearm. I am no more "seeking out" conflict than he was that night. If a mob decides to come marching through Avon neighborhoods, I will be armed. I might even be sitting on my front porch. (I might not; who knows?) In that scenario, my purpose would almost certainly require a rifle. Even then, I would no more be "seeking out" conflict than he was that night.
But we have to be careful not to conflate the questioning if actions are wise with questioning whether those actions are morally or legally right.
There was only one group - one side - "seeking out" conflict that night. That group found the conflict they sought, by creating it. Mr. "Shoot me, n***a!" started shouting and threatening Rittenhouse, then started chasing him, and then threw something at him as he ran - something that could reasonably have been believed to be a Molotov cocktail or something similarly dangerous.
Everything that happened after that is all his fault, and his responsibility. Not Rittenhouse's fault or responsibility. He was the victim.
You guys should understand the concept being discussed. It’s been discussed in many of the self defense threads on INGO over the years. And maybe it’s difficult without that context to get. Because many of us carry wherever legal, how can I go somewhere I wouldn’t go unless armed if I’m always armed? Maybe a statement that better represents the idea would be this. I would not go to downtown Louisville during a protest. It’s not safe. But if I thought, oh well, I’m armed, so I can just deal with whatever. That’s what I’m talking about, and I think what Bill is talking about. I’m not gonna think of being armed as a magic talisman that enables me to go into dangerous places that I wouldn’t go otherwise.
The riots are something different. There comes a time when people need to arm themselves and protect their own property. It’s not the time for that 17 year old kid from a different town, albeit only 20 miles away, to take on that duty. Nothing good came of his presence there, other than the people he treated. I’d say his presence there did more harm than good. He’s seen in the mainstream public as being the bad guy in all this. I don’t think that’s true, I don’t think he’s a bad kid at all. I don’t think he should have been charged. But that’s the reality. It was a lose/lose proposition, especially for him.
So about those 3 cars that were pulled over, and 9 occupants arrested. They were with a poorly named group called the “Riot Kitchen.” Apparently this group feeds protestors/rioters at various “events.” The has they were getting was for their portable generators.
Like I said earlier, if the each had a controlled substance in their possession and illegal fireworks, fine charge them... but do we really think that they ALL were holding? They also apparently had vests and helmets, but no weapons of note. Are we still thinking that all of these people should have been carted off?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.se...ehicles-held-amid-police-investigation/?amp=1
Goebbels would be proud.
Riot Kitchen?
If they were facilitating riots they should be arrested and their records seized for prosecution of the financial backers of interstate criminal activities.
Riot Kitchen?
If they were facilitating riots they should be arrested and their records seized for prosecution of the financial backers of interstate criminal activities.
...They were with a [STRIKE]poorly[/STRIKE] appropriately named group called the “Riot Kitchen.”...
THink he will get through it without an assassination attempt?Trump is visiting Kenosha today. Should be interesting.
I doubt it, I think that is what his mysterious Twitter message was about, he was going into hiding basically because he knew or had intel that he was in danger.. thats just opinion but he went into hiding for a reason.THink he will get through it without an assassination attempt?
I doubt it, I think that is what his mysterious Twitter message was about, he was going into hiding basically because he knew or had intel that he was in danger.. thats just opinion but he went into hiding for a reason.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk