Beer Virus VI-The Final Episode..... Hopefully

[GodFearinGunTotin]

It just barely passed a supermajority GOP controlled committee and only after they watered it down. Covid tyranny is a bipartisan problem.

 

[jwamplerusa]

It just barely passed a supermajority GOP controlled committee and only after they watered it down. Covid tyranny is a bipartisan problem.

That is sad, and does not bode well for Indiana.

 

[1DOWN4UP]

EXCLUSIVE Special Report: Medical profession implements WHO digital diagnosis code for the unvaxxed

Doctors will be ‘incentivized’ by the government to start asking more questions about your vax status January 17, 2023 A set of international codes are used by the medical industry for …

leohohmann.com

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I remember when these cute videos started coming out. To any critically thinking person, this was evidence we were being lied to.

 

[smokingman]

Very large study of double,and mostly triple vaxed workers with a median age of 42(over 50k people finished the study). This was completed in mid December,this release is after the peer review and editorial review. It is now fully published(it did get watered down a bit just an FYI).

In short triple vaxed gets you a 20.8% immunity to omicron and 17% for the original strain. It is less than a third of the immunity of unvaccinated people(who have had any variant) rate for omicron at 87% and the original strain of 91%.

Triple vaxed in the study also had a 13.8% hospitalization rate during the time of the study. This baffled the scientists conducting the study,especially given the median age of 42,and an over all better physically fit group(of over 50k people remember) with lower comorbidity's than the US average.

Alas they believe more study and future boosters will be needed,and more research on improving the "vaccines" ability to fight variants.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf

"The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher
numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected. A simplistic explanation might be that those
who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19. A small
proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of subjects in this study
were generally young individuals and all were eligible to have received at least 3 doses of vaccine by the
study start date...."
(insert excuse here--->)"This is not the only study to find a possible association with more
prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19. A large study found that those who had an Omicron
variant infection after previously receiving three doses of vaccine had a higher risk of reinfection than
those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving two doses of vaccine [21]. Another
study found that receipt of two or three doses of a mRNA vaccine following prior COVID-19 was
associated with a higher risk of reinfection than receipt of a single dose [7]. We still have a lot to learn...."

 

[nonobaddog]

Very large study of double,and mostly triple vaxed workers with a median age of 42(over 50k people finished the study). This was completed in mid December,this release is after the peer review and editorial review. It is now fully published(it did get watered down a bit just an FYI).

In short triple vaxed gets you a 20.8% immunity to omicron and 17% for the original strain. It is less than a third of the immunity of unvaccinated people(who have had any variant) rate for omicron at 87% and the original strain of 91%.

Triple vaxed in the study also had a 13.8% hospitalization rate during the time of the study. This baffled the scientists conducting the study,especially given the median age of 42,and an over all better physically fit group(of over 50k people remember) with lower comorbidity's than the US average.

Alas they believe more study and future boosters will be needed,and more research on improving the "vaccines" ability to fight variants.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf

"The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher
numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected. A simplistic explanation might be that those
who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19. A small
proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of subjects in this study
were generally young individuals and all were eligible to have received at least 3 doses of vaccine by the
study start date...."
(insert excuse here--->)"This is not the only study to find a possible association with more
prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19. A large study found that those who had an Omicron
variant infection after previously receiving three doses of vaccine had a higher risk of reinfection than
those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving two doses of vaccine [21]. Another
study found that receipt of two or three doses of a mRNA vaccine following prior COVID-19 was
associated with a higher risk of reinfection than receipt of a single dose [7]. We still have a lot to learn...."

"The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher
numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected."

In real science you don't whine about your expectations not being met. Forget your expectations. You use an open mind and try to figure out what the data is telling you.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

In real science you don't whine about your expectations not being met. Forget your expectations. You use an open mind and try to figure out what the data is telling you.

If you’re not working in the realm of ”political” science, unexpected results are confirmation you hypothesis might have been incorrect. On the other hand…the narrative will be upheld, data be damned.

 

[smokingman]

Department of Health and Human Services is sued after ignoring freedom of information request over censorship demands

The Surgeon General has repeatedly called for censorship of "misinformation" online.

reclaimthenet.org

Judicial watch is a great group of human beings. I hope everyone appreciates their dedication to the truth.

 

[d.kaufman]

Department of Health and Human Services is sued after ignoring freedom of information request over censorship demands

The Surgeon General has repeatedly called for censorship of "misinformation" online.

reclaimthenet.org

Judicial watch is a great group of human beings. I hope everyone appreciates their dedication to the truth.

They get $20 per month from me. It's not much but I feel good that it's going to a great organization

 

[actaeon277]

 

[bwframe]

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I'm surprised this made it into Newsweek.

It's Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong About COVID

Intellectual elitism, credentialism, and classism must end. Restoring trust in public health—and our democracy—depends on it.

www.newsweek.com

 

[actaeon277]

I'm surprised this made it into Newsweek.

It's Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong About COVID

Intellectual elitism, credentialism, and classism must end. Restoring trust in public health—and our democracy—depends on it.

www.newsweek.com

Loss of faith in the science health community.

Most definitely.

And he's right, they probably won't discuss it

 

[smokingman]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Over two years of lies. Now they "hope" people have a speedy improvement and recovery from vaccine injuries.
Oh,but the data...no that is still not public.

 

[printcraft]

I guess it's a moot point anyhow because you can't have a claim against them.
GREAT business model.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Over two years of lies. Now they "hope" people have a speedy improvement and recovery from vaccine injuries.
Oh,but the data...no that is still not public.

Trials and executions.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I guess it's a moot point anyhow because you can't have a claim against them.
GREAT business model.

Hopefully, when the evidence of corruption, lying, falsification of reports come too obvious to ignore any longer that immunity will be about as good as the one their poison provides.

 

[DadSmith]

House Republicans pass bill to end COVID-19 public health emergency

House Republicans passed a bill on Tuesday to end the COVID-19 public health emergency, moving ahead with the legislation despite the Biden administration announcing one day earlier that the declaration would end in May. The legislation — titled the Pandemic is Over Act — passed in a 220-210...

news.yahoo.com

 

[smokingman]

House Republicans pass bill to end COVID-19 public health emergency

House Republicans passed a bill on Tuesday to end the COVID-19 public health emergency, moving ahead with the legislation despite the Biden administration announcing one day earlier that the declaration would end in May. The legislation — titled the Pandemic is Over Act — passed in a 220-210...

news.yahoo.com

A bill that was introduced before Biden declared it over. It may have just been passed,but the only reason Biden set an end date(and why 4 months from now?) was because he/they knew it would pass.

 

[smokingman]

78 studies on mask effectiveness. They do not work. It really is that simple.

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com