This is Alec Baldwin, not Donald Trump.well it was what? the 48th time he's been arraigned?
This is Alec Baldwin, not Donald Trump.well it was what? the 48th time he's been arraigned?
From the article:Alec Baldwin weeps in court when judge throws out involuntary manslaughter case midtrial
Baldwin could have gotten 18 months in prison if convicted in the shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film “Rust.”www.wthr.com
Good Samaritan? WTF does that even mean in this context?
Alec Baldwin weeps in court when judge throws out involuntary manslaughter case midtrial
Baldwin could have gotten 18 months in prison if convicted in the shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film “Rust.”www.wthr.com
I didn't catch the whole story, but it sounded like the judge was saying that the prosecution screwed up royally, not turning over "evidence" in disclosure.You guys had to know this is how it was going to turn out. Guess what party this rooster lollipop donates millions to.
That's what the bestie said to me happened.I didn't catch the whole story, but it sounded like the judge was saying that the prosecution screwed up royally, not turning over "evidence" in disclosure.
I didn't catch the whole story, but it sounded like the judge was saying that the prosecution screwed up royally, not turning over "evidence" in disclosure.
Sounds like Judge basically said prosecution did more than screw up and intentionally covered up evidence that would have benefited the defense and the case was dismissed with prejudice (can't be retried).I didn't catch the whole story, but it sounded like the judge was saying that the prosecution screwed up royally, not turning over "evidence" in disclosure.
So, can the prosecutor be charged for obstruction of justice?Sounds like Judge basically said prosecution did more than screw up and intentionally covered up evidence that would have benefited the defense and the case was dismissed with prejudice (can't be retried).