I brought my first gun from him a couple of years ago, and he treated me like a prick. I have heard that he is a sheister and to not buy from him again
Something tells me, lawrence, that buying from him isn't going to be an issue....
I brought my first gun from him a couple of years ago, and he treated me like a prick. I have heard that he is a sheister and to not buy from him again
full disclosure: I've had nothing but a positive experence everytime I have had any dealings with BATFE
.what is even more, it seems all the anti-government folks on here are going to give him a free pass on it too simply because they dont' like the ATF. there should not have even been any "undercover" investigation, he should have lost his FFL months ago
All weapons siezed will be held till the end of the court proceedings and appeal process if needed. Those who have a claim to firearms stored there on consignment or for gunsmithing will have to petition the Govermment with proof of ownership to get it back.
My guess is Fred knew what he was doing, the past inspections proved a pattern of poor judgement. He's looking at 3-5 in the Federal system, his inventory and property sized and lawyers will take all he has left.
Well the things on the list that he has done I don't find morally wrong. The laws we have in place pertaining to firearms are one of the many forms of control our government uses on us. Things like this are what make me believe are country is screwed andhonestly its just sad to see it come to this.
I have made some minor purchases there and one pistol. I will say that Fred is not the most plesant of folks, but I have met worse.
Statements like this makes me wonder which way some people want it. Others sound more like borderline Soverign citizens. There is critisism of (managers) of BATF on letting guns go to build a case. (which is justifed) Then they make an arrest on someone that needed to be arrested and are critized again. Which is it!!!! As far as morally wrong it dosen't matter it was against the law. Bending it to your favor is not neccessarily make it "Morally Right" either.
As far as morally wrong it dosen't matter it was against the law.
Illegal and morally wrong are two different things. If you don't know this I'm not even going to try to have an intelligent discussion with you.
What I am saying there Lucas is, if you are breaking the law isn't that morally wrong?
He was busted for things that I don't think should be illegal, however, as long as they are illegal, it doesn't matter what I think, you had better follow the law if you don't want to go to a bang you in the *** federal penitentiary.
Wow...do you believe it should be legal to sell guns to convicted felons?!
I'd rep u again but it won't let me. This is my opinion as well. After released u have been a clean bill of health. No longer a threat to society since u have been "rehabilitated". U can vote again, right? Go to school again? Drive with a license, work, go to church.......? Maybe it depends on the felony (I haven't decided yet). After all we are always making new laws, why not amend some as well.Why not? If they've done their jail time and let out I think they should have all of their rights restored not just some of them. If they are deemed a threat to society and dangerous with guns then why are they not still in prison?
Why not? If they've done their jail time and let out I think they should have all of their rights restored not just some of them. If they are deemed a threat to society and dangerous with guns then why are they not still in prison?
Why not? If they've done their jail time and let out I think they should have all of their rights restored not just some of them. If they are deemed a threat to society and dangerous with guns then why are they not still in prison?
So consequences for committing a felony should be prison or nothing?
If you think about it really hard, the logic behind that doesn't really make sense.
Too dangerous to own a firearm and too dangerous to get a job at Subway are two different things.
You're essentially arguing that in the case of one who has committed a felony, freedom should be an all or nothing thing. Why?
Are you familiar with the prison system?
Twist my words however you want.
You must be one of the few it doesn't make sense to.
Maybe so but I'd say if you are either way you should still be in prison because you are a threat to society.
Thats not what I'm arguing; thats how you interpreted it. Not my fault.
Are you familiar with the word irrelevant?