What is your "proper compensation? $5 per firearm? $50 per fiream? I doubt you are going to get "fair market value" for them. How aobut a McDonald's or Burger King gift certificate for a happy meal?[/QUOTE]Assets retain their value, even after you purchase them. I can't afford to simply throw away such assets. If you don't agree, give me your car (or truck, as the case may be), your house, your guns, etc. Everything you own. After all, you paid for it; money out the door. No more value in those items whatsoever, right?.
Can you find an example where subsets of other rights listed in the BoR are similarly eliminated based on reasons as subjective as that?
So, then for those of us for whom shooting an AR causes significant and prolonged enjoyment, that seems to fit with your definition of "need".
NFA items are not guaranteed under the 2nd. Your ATF Form 1 or Form 4 can be denied.
Why Do You Need Those Fundamental Designs? You still havent answered.
What it means hasn't changed, only what some people WANT it to mean.
Wow. Dude. Go back and read from the start. If that's too much trouble, I have had 2 blown discs in my neck. Two surgeries resulted in 3 fused vertebrae. The recoil of a bolt-action rifle snaps my shoulder back, but my neck doesn't flex properly; it hangs up at the bottom of the fusion, causing inflammation and pain down my arms that lasted 2-4 days. Even with opiates, the pain was intense.
With the design of the AR, almost all of the recoil is absorbed. There's only a fraction of the felt-recoil of a bolt-action.
[Discussed ad nauseum....]
So you would be happy with a single shot ar15..... until you manually load one round into the chamber after every shot..... you are a hypocrite
'Cause it's how we get our jollies.Why does anyone try and argue with this guy? He's clearly not gonna understand.
Ergo, no laws whatsoever, as only the honest, law-abiding person will ever follow them.
I'm sure you have NEVER exceeded the speed limit. Otherwise, you're nothing but a lowly criminal, lost to society. Uncontrollable. A bogeyman.
Why does anyone try and argue with this guy? He's clearly not gonna understand.
Do you honestly think authorities would compensate you even that much when they implement their [STRIKE]confiscation[/STRIKE] "buyback" program?
You are correct. I'm the OP. I'm not an elitist hypocrite that says I'm the only one that should have AR's because none else can be trusted with them. Someone else is responsible for that. Carry on.Technically, it's not the OP. It's someone who opined after the OP. I think. I could be wrong. Don't want to bother to check. So. Carry on.
Ah. The old, "then we shouldn't have any laws" argument. Seriously dude.