Apple Won't Create 'Backdoor' to Help FBI Access San Bernardino Shooter's iPhone

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,233
    113
    Merrillville
    If you wrote notes in code, are you now required to decipher them? Isn't that "self incrimination"?
    Didn't the government used to hire people to break codes?
    So if they used to hire people to break codes, why is that not possible now, since a locked drive is just a code?
     

    BogWalker

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jan 5, 2013
    6,305
    63
    If they have a warrant to search your home, which you know to have incriminating evidence in it, is refusing to unlock the door legitimate under Fifth Amendment protections?

    The Apple case was different in that they were trying to force an entity uninvolved with the crime to comply, which everyone agreed was a no-go situation.
     

    poptab

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 12, 2012
    1,749
    48
    He isn't being held for a crime. 5th Amendment? He is free to litigate the validity of the court order. That's otherwise known as "due process".

    It's possible that he can't decrypt the drive because there isn't anything to decrypt.
    Also even if he provides a key doesn't mean everything will be decrypted.
     

    poptab

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 12, 2012
    1,749
    48
    If they have a warrant to search your home, which you know to have incriminating evidence in it, is refusing to unlock the door legitimate under Fifth Amendment protections?

    The Apple case was different in that they were trying to force an entity uninvolved with the crime to comply, which everyone agreed was a no-go situation.

    It's not that simple. You can see if a lock is locked.
    Random bits could be encrypted data or nothing.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deniable_encryption
     
    Top Bottom