level.eleven
Shooter
- May 12, 2009
- 4,673
- 48
I'm just saying that a state shouldn't be able to restrict the use of federal currency. The law looks illegally restrictive to me.
A district court recently upheld a similar law. It is targeted at metal thieves.
The Volokh Conspiracy » Louisiana Bans Secondhand Dealers from Paying Cash for Secondhand Goods
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16588449391523644412
What Congress has sought to do, then, is establish and maintain a uniform national currency, an aim which is incompatible with a system in which individual states can issue their own currency, or declare things other than federally-issued money to constitute legal tender. The Ordinance at issue here does no such thing, however. It merely provides that payment for junk must be in the form of a check, which in turn is payable in United States currency. Accordingly, it is neither unconstitutional nor inconsistent with § 5103.