Another incremental step - regulation of cash

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • level.eleven

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 12, 2009
    4,673
    48
    I'm just saying that a state shouldn't be able to restrict the use of federal currency. The law looks illegally restrictive to me.

    A district court recently upheld a similar law. It is targeted at metal thieves.

    The Volokh Conspiracy » Louisiana Bans Secondhand Dealers from Paying Cash for Secondhand Goods

    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16588449391523644412

    What Congress has sought to do, then, is establish and maintain a uniform national currency, an aim which is incompatible with a system in which individual states can issue their own currency, or declare things other than federally-issued money to constitute legal tender. The Ordinance at issue here does no such thing, however. It merely provides that payment for junk must be in the form of a check, which in turn is payable in United States currency. Accordingly, it is neither unconstitutional nor inconsistent with § 5103.






     

    mike8170

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 18, 2008
    1,880
    63
    Hiding from reality
    That law won't stand. It says right there on the bills "this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private"

    Funny, I ordered transcripts from the Owen County Court and they REFUSED cash. Would only take a money order. I am sure they will do everything in their power to make this stand and society becomes just slightly more restrictive.
     
    Top Bottom