navarre1095
Sharpshooter
Attachments
Last edited:
The NRA should be less willing to compromise. We always lose or give up something. I'm tired of giving up rights and getting shafted by the anti's.
This, gun community gets punished for the actions of 1 every time.
....he says as I take my shoes off and some TSA puke inspects my junk on my way to Gate 4.
If we go to 25, I think its easier to come up with an example.What has the NRA compromised on in the last 20 years? I'm curious.
I'm shocked by the drift I'm seeing that amounts to "I don't have one" or "I don't like them" and so, I'm ok with doing yet another one-way "compromise" to appease the barking hounds demanding common sense solutions in a number of gun people.
This is another Lucy and Charlie Brown episode of Charlie trying to kick the football...if we seriously believe there'll be any good faith trading here is delusional.
If we go to 25, I think its easier to come up with an example.
it would be a lot better if they hired hot redheads and brunettes to do the squeeze and poking. I'd probably fly a lot more and "accidentally" leave things in my "pockets".Don't think of it as an inspection, think of it as a free poke and squeeze!
Exactly right. ^^ Defending bump stocks is the wrong battle, imo.
I estimate I could dump a 100rd surefire in about 45-50 seconds with my Geissele SD-3G. So I can clear 150rpm or so in SA if necessary and if I'm willing to destroy an otherwise good barrel with sustained ammo wasting.
I'm not willing to give up binary triggers, however.
Now the real question, do you think video games cause violence?
Not nearly as many as you. M4, M14, UMP45, MP5. While the M4 was not bad but it eats through mags is seconds. I had my 15yr old shooting an M4 and he did well with short 3-4rd bursts. But that was 7yrds or so. M14...useless in FA. UMP was downright nice in FA, same with MP5. Not hard to keep tight groups in FA. I just finished reading "The Operator" by SEAL Team 6 member Robert Oneill. He was in a battle with the Taliban for 6 hours. In that time, he only used a mag and a half of ammo...45 rounds. For rifle work, aimed fire will always be King, FA has a very limited usefulness, even on our SWAT Team. The high demand for FA is only because we can't have it (most of us cannot afford it). I don't really care if all law abiding gun owners have a FA, but the attraction is related to the scarcity.
The NRA should be less willing to compromise. We always lose or give up something. I'm tired of giving up rights and getting shafted by the anti's.
finally a syndrome I could get behind. Or under. Or in front. Or wherever... not really all that pickyBout' dang time.....
Quick and accurate aimed fire is the most effective response in almost all circumstances and doesn't waste ammo (a precious resource if you are far from resupply). My opinion is that full auto has it's place in the following relatively uncommon circumstances:
1.) repelling human wave attacks (happened in Korea, Vietnam, and occasionally in A-stan)
2.) mag dumps into suicide car bombers. Stopping them on their approach as quickly as possible means everyone dumps everything into the vehicle as quickly as possible. You may or may not have the time and presence of mind to flip the switch, but if you are already at a checkpoint your selector setting (if applicable) may not be an issue.
3.) counter sniper fire - think of it as a quick response to fire from a building window...you saw the flash, but because of lighting you can't see to aim specifically at the person firing. Dump a burst into the window and surrounding walls, seek cover, reassess.
4.) breaking contact and relocating in a firefight/ambush when you can identify the source of enemy fire (i.e. - not just a panic response, which is pretty useless and a waste of ammo)
Experiences can and will differ. If you ever did any reading on lightfighter, you know how quickly tactics and scenarios can evolve.