Active shooter at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas...

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Sylvain

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 30, 2010
    77,468
    113
    Normandy
    He apparently was also targeting those fuel tanks at the airport. Not sure how much further those were than the crowd was.

    I saw that.
    But with huge targets like that I'm not sure you need any calculation or even optics.
    Not that I know anything about long range shooting.

    The press reported 2000 feet.

    webSHOOT-targets-Oct5-17-copy.jpg
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,312
    113
    Gtown-ish
    This is a writer for Jimmy Kimmel.

    DLtld4sXcAA_Kxn.jpg:small

    Why? Why does it seem worth clarifying? So if that's worth clarifying is the 1st amendment worth clarifying? Ooh. I know. Is it worth clarifying then, that the 19th amendment isn't "in the Constitution?"
    :rolleyes:
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,312
    113
    Gtown-ish
    ???? Meaning what???
    Ammendement to the constituion are part of the document.

    Well. Hold on. Just for the sake of argument, let's assume for argument's sake that she's right, that it makes a difference that none of the amendments are "in" it.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,179
    149
    Valparaiso
    Why? Why does it seem worth clarifying? So if that's worth clarifying is the 1st amendment worth clarifying? Ooh. I know. Is it worth clarifying then, that the 19th amendment isn't "in the Constitution?"
    :rolleyes:

    I think we have a fundamental misunderstanding of what it means to be "in the Constitution".

    For the sake of avoiding divisive rabbit trails, I will refrain from making a list of claimed Constitutional rights that are actually not in the Constitution.
     

    Sylvain

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 30, 2010
    77,468
    113
    Normandy
    This is a writer for Jimmy Kimmel.

    After this tweet, she pulled the "sexism" card at a man for responding to her inane bull****.

    DLtld4sXcAA_Kxn.jpg:small

    So the First Amendemnt and the entire Bill of Rights are also not part of the constitution? :rolleyes: :dunno:

    I like how people use their constitutionally protected First Amendment right, and freedom of speech, to tell you that the Second Amendment is not really a constitutionally protected right since they think it's not part of the constitution.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Wait.

    She might be on to something.

    Direct election of senators might not be a real thing?

    This may be worth exploring....

    ETA:
    Dangit.

    I wonder what that means for slavery....
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    I saw that.
    But with huge targets like that I'm not sure you need any calculation or even optics.
    Not that I know anything about long range shooting.

    The press reported 2000 feet.



    webSHOOT-targets-Oct5-17-copy.jpg


    You really don't need ballistic charts for targets of that size and those distances. Especially with rapid fire. This wasn't a sniper problem requiring a solution. Wind effect? LOL. Just sayin'
     

    Sylvain

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 30, 2010
    77,468
    113
    Normandy
    You really don't need ballistic charts for targets of that size and those distances. Especially with rapid fire. This wasn't a sniper problem requiring a solution. Wind effect? LOL. Just sayin'

    It's what I was saying.
    It's like 600 yards away.
    I bet I could hit that with iron sights and "no sniper training".
    At least hit one of the two tanks even if I was aiming for the other one. :):

    The guy might still have overthinked it and worry about windage even though it was not needed.
    At least the time he took making calculation he didn't use it to shoot his fellow citizens.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,103
    113
    Avon
    This is a writer for Jimmy Kimmel.

    After this tweet, she pulled the "sexism" card at a man for responding to her inane bull****.

    DLtld4sXcAA_Kxn.jpg:small

    The real question here is: did the Constitution get amended, or did the Constitution acquire an amendment?
     

    Sylvain

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 30, 2010
    77,468
    113
    Normandy
    I don't buy the "trying to get the tanks to blow up" thing.

    Having some DOPE info doesn't change that.

    Why not? Lots of people think a bullet will make a gas tank explode like you see in movies.
    Maybe he wasn't a Mythbusters fan.

    Also he might have had additional plans to ignite the fuel once he pierced the tanks with bullets.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,179
    149
    Valparaiso
    Why not? Lots of people think a bullet will make a gas tank explode like you see in movies.
    Maybe he wasn't a Mythbusters fan.

    Also he might have had additional plans to ignite the fuel once he pierced the tanks with bullets.

    If I see additional information that supports it, maybe, but I haven't see it.
     

    JAL

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2017
    2,424
    113
    Indiana
    I don't know an engineer who carries all the formulas for their particular discipline in their head any more. But there isn't all that much you need for ballistics cosigns. The bullet drop from horizontal is often on cartridge boxes.

    SOHCAHTOA is first semester trig in high school. Nothing mysterious about it.

    My iphone has a built-in compass app. Included therein is a level. I can get a very good read on angle with it.
    Could be my age . . . SOHCAHTOA took me a couple minutes to decipher . . . yup, it's HS Trig early in 1st semester. We weren't taught this mnemonic. Not difficult to get a horizontal angle or a vertical angle using a cell phone using the edge for sighting using the level or compass apps. Ancient astronomers used the same sighting principles in their methods millennia before the invention of the telescope. Also easy to estimate distances. Building height for that class of structure is easily estimated as about 10 feet per floor. The shooting position on the 32nd floor is about 315 feet above the bottom of the ground floor ((31*10) + 5). Add however elevated that is above ground level, if it is elevated. For a non-isosceles right triangle, any one side length plus one angle other than the right angle solves the entire triangle. I daresay the answer will be within 5 feet of a more precisely measured height with 1 inch precision. How much precision is needed? For a large area target, not much. Two significant digits is more than sufficient. 315 feet with 2.5 significant digits is close enough unless the venue is significantly different in elevation than the base of the hotel (add or subtract an estimate of that).

    It's clear from his choice of elevation for the horizontal distance to the concert venue and the direction in which people would attempt to flee that he understood "field of fire" concepts, particularly regarding "beaten zone" and perhaps "enfilade fire", if not from formal study, then by logical deduction in basic ballistic analysis.

    Beaten Zone:
    Although Beaten Zone usually refers to indirect fire, especially with artillery, it also applies to longer distance areal machine gun fire in which a non-trivial projectile drop must be considered. Its use for MG fire arose to prominence during WWI. It defines the zone which will be covered by traverse limits at a specific elevation setting (or range of settings) in which a standing soldier will be hit somewhere from the head to the foot (first catch to last graze). Too much or too little elevation above the Beaten Zone reduces the hit probability within the desired Beaten Zone. "Kill Box" is newer jargon often used to characterize a Beaten Zone.

    Enfilade Fire:
    This is also known as flanking fire firing down ranks of soldiers. Navies call it raking fire, and from aircraft it's the preferred direction for strafing fire. Traverse becomes much more important than elevation as you're guaranteed to hit soldiers somewhere within the ranks with proper traverse. Artillery in particular was mostly direct fire, albeit longer range, up through the 19th Century. Traverse was much easier to aim than determining elevation for range with variation in powder charge and projectile mass. Properly used enfilade fire was deadly, but on a modern conventional battlefield is highly unlikely to present an opportunity.

    John
     

    Sylvain

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 30, 2010
    77,468
    113
    Normandy
    If I see additional information that supports it, maybe, but I haven't see it.

    Maybe he had tracer/incendiary rounds in the room.

    But I'm not sure what was the plan if he managed to ignite the fuel anyway.
    The tanks seems too far away from the crowd to hurt anybody.
    There's a large open space all around.

    Maybe the smoke would stop air traffic, keep news and police helicopters away from the scene ... :dunno:
    Possibly allowing him to escape with one of the planes he allegedly owned?

    The_Las_Vegas_gunmans_bullets-ce4e32b979c6556dedba4ac01606bc56
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Top Bottom