Has there been any report at all saying why this "person" did what he did? He's obviously deranged. Someone would have to be possessed by the devil himself to do something like this.
I think about the Gilligan family from time to time. I believe it was 1980. The little boy and girl would have grown up, married and had kids and maybe grandkids by now. Instead........
Has the ACPA made any statement about seeking the death penalty?
Let's try him quickly so we can get a needle in his arm and send him where he belongs.
You say this as though the process is a mere formality.
Reading his freely given statement, listening to Ken answer questions about it, and talking to people familiar with the family...I'm gonna have to agree this time. Formality.
I'm inclined to agree, based on what I've read, but it's that inclination that makes me doubly anxious to jealously guard the idea of due process and presumption of innocence. Groupthink gets more and more dangerous the more frantically we trip over ourselves to skip steps and get to the resolution.
I'm inclined to agree, based on what I've read, but it's that inclination that makes me doubly anxious to jealously guard the idea of due process and presumption of innocence. Groupthink gets more and more dangerous the more frantically we trip over ourselves to skip steps and get to the resolution.
I don't disagree with due process. It's important.
What I waffle about is the "presumption of innocence" after a detailed confession that was not coerced, followed by leading investigators to all the places where pieces of body were tossed.
To that, I would say; "Good bye, presumption of innocence...hello, Indiana death penalty."
Maybe that makes me horrible. Or maybe it makes me a good kind of neighbor to have. I don't know where that line is.
If a rabid dog says "hey, I'm rabid and I just shredded one of your neighborhood kids and there's no guarantee I won't do it again first chance I get"...do you leash him and say "c'mon, boy...let's take a walk and discuss it"?
Or does he get put down?
Bah.
I can't talk about this anymore. My stomach hurts and I may just hurl.
I don't disagree with due process. It's important.
What I waffle about is the "presumption of innocence" after a detailed confession that was not coerced, followed by leading investigators to all the places where pieces of body were tossed.
To that, I would say; "Good bye, presumption of innocence...hello, Indiana death penalty."
Maybe that makes me horrible. Or maybe it makes me a good kind of neighbor to have. I don't know where that line is.
If a rabid dog says "hey, I'm rabid and I just shredded one of your neighborhood kids and there's no guarantee I won't do it again first chance I get"...do you leash him and say "c'mon, boy...let's take a walk and discuss it"?
Or does he get put down?
Bah.
I can't talk about this anymore. My stomach hurts and I may just hurl.
and be able to convince the most hardened skeptic that the perpetrator is found and is getting what he deserves.