I've often wondered what OSUT stands for. Ohio State University Titties?I just wish @KG1 would venture outside of GenPol. I guess he's not "tough" enough to visit the OSUT thread. But we are a pretty scary bunch over there.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
9.10.24 Presidential Debate
- Thread starter bwframe
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Interestingly, Trump doing the long form interviews has a flavor of just this. The ability to have a conversation lay out visions, strategy, identify problems strengths and weaknesses, convey the opportunities seen.
I don't know of any long form interviews the Ho has done.
Thanks. And maybe, I think it's pinned to the top of "new posts" lol.Official Status Update Thread. It's in the Break Room.
But it was a statement Davis herself made during the interview that has raised eyebrows. In it, she seemingly admitted the reason why they heavily fact-checked Trump was because they wanted it to be different than the CNN debate, where Trump's performance and Biden's disastrous appearance led to the latter being forced out of the presidential race nearly a month later, where he was then replaced by his VP:
“People were concerned that statements were allowed to just hang and not [be] disputed by the candidate Biden, at the time, or the moderators,”
“People were concerned that statements were allowed to just hang and not [be] disputed by the candidate Biden, at the time, or the moderators,”
I was thinking she was being told what to say and do while it was going on.
This makes sense because she normally has no clue what to say or do.
Then the moderators were in on this the whole time.
If this is true of course.
If this comes out as the X posts suggest it will be a huge black eye for the entire mainstream media…
I don't know this guy so not sure how credible he is. He does list a few articles etc.
Company behind bluetooth earrings issue verdict on Kamala's debate
A company that makes bluetooth earrings that resemble Kamala Harris' debate jewelry has offered their wares to Donald Trump as well, with one caveat.
manifest destiny
Master
Has "whistleblower" become the new term for "unnamed sources"? I thought the term whistleblower carried some sort of legal shielding so that wrongdoings can be exposed without fear of retribution.
In recent practice, "whistleblowers" seem to be used for otherwise unsubstantiated claims much like the "unnamed sources" of the past.
"Well, [someone I can't name] told me [something I can't prove] and it makes [my current political target] look bad." - yours truly, Everytalkinghead.
In recent practice, "whistleblowers" seem to be used for otherwise unsubstantiated claims much like the "unnamed sources" of the past.
"Well, [someone I can't name] told me [something I can't prove] and it makes [my current political target] look bad." - yours truly, Everytalkinghead.
These Nazi's have to get their list for the death camps they desire.
When do you believe the definition changed. Who gave the definition you understood? Are unnamed sources a thing if the past? In the day of doxxing we live in do you blame whistleblowers for wanting to be behind the scenes publicly?
If the whistleblower works for ABC news they would face instant reprisals. I don’t blame them.
Not yet, but we already have an admission agreement of rigging the debate by Kameltoe’s sorority sister that was a moderator…
An " un-named source" gives the media the ability to make up a story without having to verify a source or have any accountability for the truthfulness of it, it can't be "fact checked".
A "whistleblower" at least implies that there is a confirmable source to the report that, eventually, may be verifiable.
The left wing media uses "un-named source" way to much in reporting and they use it to push their deceitful, lying agendas without having to be accountable.
Good definition. In the current situation they are working on redacting a formal affidavit which I see as a confirmable source, even if we do not know who it is…
Found a poll from yesterday. According to this one he's ahead.
Election 2024: Trump 49%, Harris 47%
The race for the White House continues to be close, as former President Donald Trump holds a two-point lead over Vice President Kamala Harris.
Site Supporter
Staff online
-
d.kaufmanStill Here -
KellyinAvonBlue-ID Mafia Consigliere
Members online
- EPeter213
- blainepoe
- Bookmark
- Osprey
- hereforthecootbash
- harmonyaudio
- Sphinx313
- rbhargan
- Doug
- billybob44
- Flash-hider
- ars
- blacknwhite
- 42769vette
- Jdubbs
- manifest destiny
- Jin
- loony1
- jzwhts
- Sc1873
- pewpewINpewpew
- d.kaufman
- 1775usmarine
- Butch627
- KellyinAvon
- El Conquistador
- cakndsn
- wcd
- Irish354
- Malware
- STAGE 2
- Clark & Addison
- INgunowner
- Bugzilla
- oze
- Lilboog82
- nbunga
- Emerson Dambiggins
- Timjoebillybob
- Itchytriggerfinger
- djlaundry2000
- Scott58
- Chalky
- flint stonez
- phylodog
- buckwacker
- Bottlefed
- Bennettjh
- loudgroove
- KG1