[1A] The Free Speech Thread

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • 2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,351
    113
    NWI
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    I disagree.

    I do not believe that riot is covered in the ninth either.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,103
    113
    Avon
    I disagree.

    I do not believe that riot is covered in the ninth either.

    From my very limited reading of this case, I don't think this question was under discussion.

    It doesn't appear that Doe alleges that McKesson was responsible for the riot, through his words, actions, or otherwise. It appears that Doe alleges that McKesson was responsible for the harm that befell Doe, because Doe failed to stop the harmful actor.

    I don't see how the argument is a first amendment matter, at all.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,351
    113
    NWI

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    i know it's not technically 1a, but i'm in a wierd mood tonight

    George Carlin on the 7 words

    Edit: Obviously NSFW language

    [video=youtube_share;kyBH5oNQOS0]https://youtu.be/kyBH5oNQOS0[/video]
     
    Last edited:

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,361
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Maybe companies should stop selling things to new york.

    NY is a really big market to have to stay out of. I think your solution is a practical solution on a certain scale. But when things reach the scale where it becomes a proposition of "take it or leave it", where leaving it is more costly than taking it. They do the thing that costs less. It's sort of using Capitalism's shortcomings against it to have power over these companies to get them to capitulate.

    So when things become of the scale of NY, probably only way to defeat it is for an association of merchants to all leave. But it takes nearly all of them to do it in a way that hurts NY enough to pressure them to stop. And that's hard to do.
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    531,022
    Messages
    9,964,687
    Members
    54,974
    Latest member
    1776Defend2ndAmend
    Top Bottom