Search results

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
    1. L

      Another anti-gunner preaching violence. Son of NJ Senate Majority Leader.

      I thought we weren't counting suicides as handgun violence? I'm confused.
    2. L

      Obama Administration to Issue Decree on Transgender Access to School Restrooms

      I'm curious; what part of the Constitution supports forced sodomy as punishment for whatever crime you perceive the President as having committed?
    3. L

      The insane social justice thread

      That, or they just think it'd make an interesting movie. Not everything is a conspiracy, y'know.
    4. L

      Gunpocalypse coming down in California

      Full representation in the legislature is contingent upon whether people agree with you? That's a bit undemocratic, don't you think? The cities you mentioned, by themselves, are over 5% of the population. Since California is net negative on federal funds (they pay in a bit more than comes...
    5. L

      Pence Losing Ground In Governors Race

      If it's functionally identical in a courtroom to the original, then who cares how it's phrased? Words don't matter, only end results do.
    6. L

      Donald Trump is a Giant Vampire Squid

      The population will continue to divide regardless of who's president. We don't really have anything in common from which to forge a national identity anymore. That's not a bad thing, but just the way it is.
    7. L

      Please consider this point

      That one, and Eisenstadt. Judge for yourself, skip to 6:24: https://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2016/05/caffeinated-thoughts-radio-5-14-16-guests-steve-king-daniel-ladoux/ You can contemplate whether those cases were decided correctly; you're the lawyer, not me. But whether they represent society...
    8. L

      Please consider this point

      Steve King.
    9. L

      Please consider this point

      *raises hand I have to decide which party represents me. When you have a GOP Representative saying that allowing married couples to use contraception is society "going downhill", then I have to ask: is this what I want to get behind? Is this the party that I want to lend legitimacy to? I...
    10. L

      WTB: A-frame front sight

      I have a takeoff from a PSA upper that I'm not using. I don't know the gas port size, so I can't guarantee it's exactly what you want, but you can have it (it's not doing anyone any good sitting in my parts box). PM me and I'll get your shipping info. Thanks!
    11. L

      Obama sets a new record for continuous warfare

      So wait, is he waging permanent war on the Muslims, or secretly sympathizing with them? I forgot my anything-Obama-does secret decoder ring.
    12. L

      The insane social justice thread

      Knock yourself out. Meantime, I have a mortgage to pay.
    13. L

      The insane social justice thread

      Sounds better than unemployment, yeah.
    14. L

      The insane social justice thread

      So, just as Indiana gets rolling as a tech hub thanks to low cost of living and a near-infinitely-portable product, you're going to torpedo that by making Hoosiers a legal landmine for national corporations? So much for the party of smart fiscal decisions.
    15. L

      Trump, Clinton or Third Party

      Because what made Cruz look thin-skinned and Rubio look childish will make Hillary look sympathetic.
    16. L

      Logical extensions of bathroom decision

      You would think that firearm owners, of all people, would understand the importance of judging something on its merits instead of assuming that a thing must be banned because someone, somewhere, could possibly do something bad with it.
    17. L

      Logical extensions of bathroom decision

      I already said that I'd be behind a solution that wouldn't involve redefining anything. But that didn't end up happening, so we're stuck with the present situation for the foreseeable future. Besides, "we've always done it this way" is hardly a compelling argument. We also used to only let men...
    18. L

      Logical extensions of bathroom decision

      How is the government supposed to enforce the law if they don't define the language? If religion defines marriage, then the government becomes the enforcement arm of the church. Better the law be repealed entirely than let that happen.
    19. L

      Logical extensions of bathroom decision

      Personally, I would have preferred that we turn marriage over to the religious, and simply enact civil unions for all (gay or straight); it really makes no difference to me what the legal term for my relationship with my spouse is. But if we're not going to do that, then having separate...
    20. L

      Logical extensions of bathroom decision

      Separate but equal is your idea of a "reasonable alternative"?
    Top Bottom