I don't join because they don't represent my interests anymore. Also, the way Wayne LaPierre has been handling interviews is disappointing at best.
I don't feel comfortable paying a large sum of money to have my interests underrepresented and compromised on. And I don't want to pay someone to see him fumble through interviews I could have done better myself.
If they changed their areas of focus to all gun owners and carry rights, and elected a new spokesman, I would probably join. Until then... I just see them as a blight with their hands out.
I don't join because they don't represent my interests anymore. Also, the way Wayne LaPierre has been handling interviews is disappointing at best.
I don't feel comfortable paying a large sum of money to have my interests underrepresented and compromised on. And I don't want to pay someone to see him fumble through interviews I could have done better myself.
What The NRA's Wayne Lapierre Gets Paid To Defend Guns - Forbes
If you’re a transparency fan like me, you appreciate knowing what kind of skin public people have in the game during episodes like this. So what did the NRA pay Lapierre to say that the best way to stop school shootings is to have the government put every mentally ill person in the nation on a watch list and arm school personnel to defend schools like banks?
Just under a million bucks.
That’s according to the most recent NRA filings with the IRS.
The numbers are a bit out of date. The last filing of a Form 990 from the NRA was in 2010. Still, if you’re interested in the numbers behind America’s most powerful gun lobby, it makes for interesting reading.
The organization’s mission is simply stated, right at the top: “To protect and defend the U.S. Constitution.” To accomplish this, in 2010 the NRA reported that it had 781 full time employees, 125,000 volunteers and generated revenues of $227.8 million.
Where does all that come from? In 2010, $71 million came from contributions and grants, $100 million from membership fees and $46 million from other revenue sources, like ad sales ($20 million) royalties, rents and subscriptions.
In 2010 that wasn’t enough to cover expenses. In total, they spent $243.5 million, leaving a $15 million shortfall, at least that year, which was cushioned by assets of $37.5 million.
Where did all the money go? About $33 million went to salaries and wages (not including the top brass), $28 million went to advertising and promotions. By far the biggest items were membership outreach: $57 million for membership communications, $24 million for printing and shipping, $16 million for educational programs. Just about $10 million went to the NRA’s lobbying arm, the Institute for Legislative Action.
More than $12.7 million went to Akron-Ohio based InfoCision, a huge telemarketing company that lists a broad spectrum of blue chip non-profits as clients– including Smile Train, the American Diabetes Association, Easter Seals and Unicef—as well as the College Republican National Committee and companies like Time Warner and AT&T.
As for salaries, fifty-six people in the organization earned more than $100,000 in 2010—and 10 made more than $250,000. Lapierre does not top the list. Kayne B. Robinson, the executive director of general operations does. He was paid just over $1 million. Lapierre was second, pulling in $970,000 in reportable and estimated comp.
Chris W. Cox, the executive director of the group’s lobbying efforts, was third. He earned just over $666,000.
-----------
Keep sending in those checks.
Did it ever occur to any of you that the NRA is the sharpton/Jackson of gun rights? If they actually accomplished their mission, there'd be a lot of people out of high paying jobs.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
I've ways just thought of the NRA as a group that gives false hope to gun owners as it takes their money. They give the illusion of having the backs of the gun opening public while compromising the second amendment away. They really aren't doing anything different than any anti-gun group. They're just doing it at a slower pace.
I am a member because the NRA, love them or hate them are the voice of gun owners in America. They are the strongest force for our side. I believe apathy is the reason the membership is not larger, the same reason we have such low voter turn out. People that I know, especially hunters don't think any legislation will ever really effect them. Sort of a not really my problem mindset.
Look at the last rally downtown. We had a good turn out but why didn't we have at least three times the numbers?
Apathy, it is becoming the American way. It's why we have a King and not a President.
Would you rather they hire the homeless with no abilities at minimum wage, as if that will work well.
Good management costs bucks.
Of the nearly $230 million the NRA raised, $10 million went to lobbying. Over triple that went to salaries. Over 1/4 of that amount was spent on just 3 salaries. Keep sending those checks.
Of the nearly $230 million the NRA raised, $10 million went to lobbying. Over triple that went to salaries. Over 1/4 of that amount was spent on just 3 salaries. Keep sending those checks.
I'll repeat myself, mayhap it'll sink in this time.
Would you rather they hire the homeless with no abilities at minimum wage, as if that will work well.
Good management costs bucks.
Ever see a successful company run by a bum?
They didn't get to where they are by hiring incompetent leaders.
Have you looked at a budget, of a local church, LATELY ?????
It usually doesn't occur to many people, because many are blinded by the light.