Another specious option is to buy DVD in Indy or FW. 5-10 dollars and you are good to go or so I hear.....( unless they recorded it from their seat and people are walking in front of the movie.....)
So...theft?
Another specious option is to buy DVD in Indy or FW. 5-10 dollars and you are good to go or so I hear.....( unless they recorded it from their seat and people are walking in front of the movie.....)
So...theft?
it can be found online...if that sort of thing doesn't bother you.
The movie and book are both available online for free. Google is your friend. An Android phone can get you almost anything you want to watch, then drop $30 on Chromecast and you're set.
If you're motivated and look in the right places, you can find just about any movie you want for free on the internet. I do not condone these actions, nor do I participate. But the option is there. Just sayin'...
I wonder if it's available online anywhere ?
Yet it is still one of the cheapest forms of entertainment. Especially when you take into the fact you are watching a multi million dollar production. In a building that cost's multiple millions.
No one forces you to stop at the snack bar.
And people have no problem paying much more to watch a bunch of over paid felons running around a field, with a bunch of drunks in attendance.
A good day at the range could be $60-$70 just for the ammo for one person.
A good meal at a restaurant for 5 would be in the $75.00 range and not last 2hrs like a movie.
Movie ticket prices have not kept up with the price increase's in most other forms of entertainment.
Wait for PPV if you don't want to hit a theater.
If you want to find online for free, you may wish to check out Gander Mountain for ammo too. I hear they don't have employees watching the ammo aisle all the time and you can probably sneak out with a few boxes if you do it during a busy time.
Let me be clear, downloading a pirated movie is theft.
Having said that the movie industry is going to have to wake up and smell the coffee. I was around when Napster first started and yes, I downloaded free music. However I repeatedly said that I would be more than willing to pay a buck a song. I was just tired of having to buy a $16 CD just to get the one or two songs I wanted. It took a while and the music industry swore it was going to ruin the business, but has anyone bought a physical CD lately?
Digital downloads, or better yet steaming, of movies are the wave of the future. The trick will be to keep them from being easily shared. This is where steaming is the answer in my mind. Pay a fee of maybe $10 and have it expire in 24-48 hours.
It will cut earnings on movies but I for one will not feel bad if these stars only get 2 or 3 million per movie instead of 20-30.
A lot of people like the experience of going to a movie in a theater but it is absurd that you practically have to fill out a loan application to take you family to the movies now. When all my kids were at home, we had five people. $11 per ticket =$55 plus another $40 - $50 at the snack bar and your dropping a C note on a movie.
Are you saying duplicating copy written material without renumeration or consent is lawful, or just playing a word game?
Full Definition of THEFT
1
a : the act of stealing; specifically : the felonious taking and removing of personal property with intent to deprive the rightful owner of it
b : an unlawful taking (as by embezzlement or burglary) of property
I don't think that the duplication of imaginary property qualifies as "theft" in any sense of the word.
Even if you believe that publicly released ideas qualify as "property", the original owner is not deprived of that property when it is duplicated.
Are you saying duplicating copy written material without renumeration or consent is lawful, or just playing a word game?
Call it whatever you want, but it's stealing by the common definition of the word. I'm not interested in arguing for arguing's sake. Everyone knew exactly what I meant and I'm not interested in justification as to why it's not morally wrong, because it is.
Is Primewire.unblocked legal or not?
You all do know laws are like records.....they are made to be broken.
Think of how many of us buy stuff on line because they don't collect taxes....but by LAW we are suppose to report that on our state tax returns. How many of us really keep track of that stuff? It is nearly impossible to keep track of who collected taxes and who didnt....prime example of a law that is made to be broken.....just sayin
No, the common definition of the word involves taking property from someone and thereby depriving them of it.
Nobody is deprived of their property when you duplicate something that they have already released.
You could simply call it copyright infringement, but that wouldn't be as inflammatory as you'd like.