Thanks!Two bodies found in Carroll County
I wasn't expecting, "Odinists? Oh wow we should dismiss the case!" either. Nobody expects the Nordic Odinists.... :) Or the comfy chair...www.indianagunowners.com
Thanks!Two bodies found in Carroll County
I wasn't expecting, "Odinists? Oh wow we should dismiss the case!" either. Nobody expects the Nordic Odinists.... :) Or the comfy chair...www.indianagunowners.com
Thanks!Yes. ...
More lawyer vs. Judge- this is from the attorney who appeared only to address the disqualification of counsel issue.
"6. On October 19, 2023, Judge Gull obtained a coerced and involuntary oral motion of Mr. Baldwin. That withdrawal is a nullity and invalid as not in compliance with Rules 3.8 and 7.0(B) of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure. Mr. Baldwin has never filed a written motion to withdraw and will not do so. By operation of trial rules he remains counsel of record.
7. On that same date the court obtained in the same manner an oral promise from Attorney Rozzi to file a motion to withdraw which he has not done and will not do.
Wowser. Seems like there‘s going to be body(ies) hitting the floor on one side or the other.More lawyer vs. Judge- this is from the attorney who appeared only to address the disqualification of counsel issue.
…
25 years of practice- never heard of anything remotely like this.This is incredible. She says Rozzi withdrew, he says he didn't. Shouldn't this be easy to prove?
Has this ever happened before?
When do you finally get to finish practice and do something?25 years of practice- never heard of anything remotely like this.
Strange....is this attorney aware he is in Indiana?More lawyer vs. Judge- this is from the attorney who appeared only to address the disqualification of counsel issue.
"6. On October 19, 2023, Judge Gull obtained a coerced and involuntary oral motion of Mr. Baldwin. That withdrawal is a nullity and invalid as not in compliance with Rules 3.8 and 7.0(B) of the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure. Mr. Baldwin has never filed a written motion to withdraw and will not do so. By operation of trial rules he remains counsel of record.
It's like someone is writing a screen play. It will make a hell of a movie.One of my partners has a theory about the whole confidential documents thing...complete speculation, maybe far-fetched, but he wondered out loud who was paying for the new lawyers in the Original Action and whether the interests of the defendant may overlap with a media outlet of some sort.
Also, in the Original Action, at least 1 document, possibly 2 that the trial court had marked as confidential were filed publicly. One of them explains the crime scene photo leak and a suicide connected with it.
There's one thing certain about Allen's attorneys.
View attachment 308963
What's your opinion of the judge in this case? Her actions, inactions etc.There's one thing certain about Allen's attorneys.
I don't really have an opinion based upon facts because I have only heard one side.What's your opinion of the judge in this case? Her actions, inactions etc.
Word. Probably in the sleeve linings to hide it extra gooder...Has anyone checked the judges robe lining for an odinist patch?