Train derailment in Ohio and chemical release

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Shadow01

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 8, 2011
    4,087
    119
    WCIn
    step back and take a breath on the landfill issue. Are we not afraid of all that other stuff in the landfill leaching into the groundwater? Because you know there is other stuff in there.


    Or is this like reading the label on a processed food where you were fine eating it before, but NOW you know whats in there?
    If it isn’t safe to leave it where it is, what assurance is there that moving to any landfill is better? We have been asked to trust the RR and they have failed. We are asked to trust our government and they have failed. We are asked to trust the FBI,DOJ,ATF and so on but they have failed.

    why must this be reduced to “it can’t be worse than what is already in the landfill “ mantra. You have to start refusing somewhere If you want to make progress. I guess we can use the same thinking for schools, liberal push on gun control and hundreds of other issues. We have already allowed intrusion in these areas, why push back now?
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    33,218
    77
    Camby area
    If it isn’t safe to leave it where it is, what assurance is there that moving to any landfill is better? We have been asked to trust the RR and they have failed. We are asked to trust our government and they have failed. We are asked to trust the FBI,DOJ,ATF and so on but they have failed.

    why must this be reduced to “it can’t be worse than what is already in the landfill “ mantra. You have to start refusing somewhere If you want to make progress. I guess we can use the same thinking for schools, liberal push on gun control and hundreds of other issues. We have already allowed intrusion in these areas, why push back now?
    The point of that local landfill being used is because it in particular has very specific traits for this exact type of specialized waste; Rubber and plastic liners to prevent any escape of chemicals from inside the landfill. Its not just a hole in the ground where they dump the stuff then cover with plastic and earth. They cant just say "Oh, OK. In that case we'll just send it to the Harding Street landfill on Indy's south side with the rest of the household waste. "

    So it looks like the time to prevent waste like this was back when this landfill was built. Not now. Kinda like you cant raise a stink when a serial killer is about to be transferred to the local supermax. If you didnt want him here, you should have prevented the thing from being built. It feels like this is already past the point of no return.

    But feel free to protest all you want.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,071
    149
    Indiana
    Dioxins have caused entire towns to be abandoned.
    Given we know dioxins were created by the burning,and in concentrations above that seen anywhere else...is it any wonder the EPA has not tested for them(if they have they are not willing to share)?

    Not a single test(if done not made public),even though at nightly town meetings it has been then the number one question asked of the EPA for almost a week.



    The town will likely be a super fund site,it is just a matter of when.
    The EPA will not test for dioxins.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    33,218
    77
    Camby area
    Who's environment are the protecting?
    Apparently only blue states.

    Mark my words. A blue state ( or Canada) will request Dioxin testing from downwind contamination and they'll test. Probably quietly.

    Or look at it this way. If they dont test, they dont know. If they dont know, they dont have to fix.
     

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    95   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    39,115
    113
    Btown Rural
    The point of that local landfill being used is because it in particular has very specific traits for this exact type of specialized waste; Rubber and plastic liners to prevent any escape of chemicals from inside the landfill. Its not just a hole in the ground where they dump the stuff then cover with plastic and earth. They cant just say "Oh, OK. In that case we'll just send it to the Harding Street landfill on Indy's south side with the rest of the household waste. "

    So it looks like the time to prevent waste like this was back when this landfill was built. Not now. Kinda like you cant raise a stink when a serial killer is about to be transferred to the local supermax. If you didnt want him here, you should have prevented the thing from being built. It feels like this is already past the point of no return.

    But feel free to protest all you want.

    How are they gonna get the toxic waist here? The same RR Company trains responsible for the disaster in the first place?


    :scratch: :n00b:
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,071
    149
    Indiana
    How are they gonna get the toxic waist here? The same RR Company trains responsible for the disaster in the first place?


    :scratch: :n00b:
    Well from what I read it will require 100+ trucks.
    Not that we are even sure if the site can hold or process it yet.
     

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    95   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    39,115
    113
    Btown Rural
    Well from what I read it will require 100+ trucks.
    Not that we are even sure if the site can hold or process it yet.

    If Holcomb had any nads, he'd TELL them not to bring it here. "We will have the State Police turn you around at the state line!" "Sue us, if you choose. We're happy to fight this out in court, and the press."


    .
     

    DadSmith

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 21, 2018
    25,995
    113
    Ripley County
    step back and take a breath on the landfill issue. Are we not afraid of all that other stuff in the landfill leaching into the groundwater? Because you know there is other stuff in there.


    Or is this like reading the label on a processed food where you were fine eating it before, but NOW you know whats in there?
    Why here? Why not ship it to the waste lands of California or Nevada where it would not be around anyone or anything useful?
     

    gassprint1

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Dec 15, 2015
    1,624
    113
    NWI
    Why here? Why not ship it to the waste lands of California or Nevada where it would not be around anyone or anything useful?
    This day and age, you would think there would be a processing plant that would leach out the chemicals in the dirt an such for recycling. They figured out how to pull lead fom old tube tvs alobg with other stuff, so why not this too.
     

    KittySlayer

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 29, 2013
    6,486
    77
    Northeast IN
    This day and age, you would think there would be a processing plant that would leach out the chemicals in the dirt an such for recycling. They figured out how to pull lead fom old tube tvs alobg with other stuff, so why not this too.
    All the engineers are probably busy trying to figure out how to deal with the dead battery crisis that will plague the nation in the next decade.
     

    jwamplerusa

    High drag, low speed...
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Feb 21, 2018
    4,747
    113
    Boone County

    Magyars

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    46   0   0
    Mar 6, 2010
    12,387
    113
    Delaware County Freehold

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,071
    149
    Indiana
    How are they gonna get the toxic waist here? The same RR Company trains responsible for the disaster in the first place?


    :scratch: :n00b:
    About that. The state is blocking them.
    The source also told the Ohio Star that Governor DeWine attempted to block scientists from entering state parks:

    The governor and the railroad were blocking scientists from getting soil samples in East Palestine, but they were able to still grab some for testing. Likewise, the soils are highly contaminated," the source said.
    The source claims that the Ohio governor only uses his own hand-picked scientists to "give him the results he wants."
    "It is heartbreaking to me that politicians like DeWine make an issue like this political. It should not be. He should be doing all he can to protect people, animals and the environment and not just cover his own behind," the source added.

    According to local TV station WKBN, residents have sent a list of demands for Norfolk Southern and the federal government, outlining the much-needed help their community deserves after a botched response.

    Below is the list of demands:

    1. Relocation for anyone who wants it. Folks don't feel safe and aren't getting their questions answered. Anyone who wants to be relocated to hotels or safe housing should have the opportunity to do so, paid for by Norfolk Southern.
    2. Independent environmental testing. The EPA must immediately begin and continue to test soil, water, and air, including for dioxins throughout the region, and commit to regular public meetings to explain findings. Norfolk Southern must pay for an independent scientist, hired by residents, to represent the community and participate in all technical meetings regarding testing, cleanup, and safety plans.
    3. Ongoing medical testing and monitoring: We still don't know what the short and long-term health impacts of this disaster will be. Federal Health & Human Services must provide ongoing health monitoring to evaluate those in the impacted region, guarantee health coverage, and Norfolk Southern must cover the cost.
    4. Dispose of the toxic waste safely: The EPA cannot take the solid waste from the derailment and dispose of it in the Heritage Thermal toxic incinerator, in nearby East Liverpool, that has already been polluting our communities for years. This will only further spread the contaminants. Norfolk Southern must stop destroying evidence – we need a safety plan before resuming cleanup from the derailment site.
    5. Norfolk Southern pays 100% of the costs. Taxpayers shouldn't foot this bill. Norfolk Southern made this mess, they should clean it up. The company must commit to paying 100% of the costs for testing, relocation, cleanup, medical monitoring and costs, and an independent science advisor.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,071
    149
    Indiana
    They started testing on the 20th,no results released online that I could find. This is the only news article I found about it at all.


    *edit. Of course they are using twitter. They also tow the EPA line fairly well at this point and have not released the most of the data. So this is a pointless post. sigh
     
    Last edited:

    Shadow01

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 8, 2011
    4,087
    119
    WCIn
    so how many dump trucks haul material without a single piece of that material falling out of the bed while traveling?

    sounds like a great way of moving the waste to a landfill.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    37,734
    113
    .
    As a smart policy, landfills are the place of last resort for stuff because of RCRA/CERCLA laws written in the late 70s. When somebody disposes of waste in a land fill it's still attached to them, regardless of changes in the law. Only government entities, cites, towns, agencies, are exempt. As much waste as possible is destroyed by incineration as that ends the legal "chain of custody." Back in the 80s many businesses were put through the federal meat grinder when land fills that they had done business with were closed. These land fill operations were licensed and inspected by the government at the time, but the law changed, and then they were not. The federal government then went after all of their customers, except of course the above mentioned ones with exemptions.

    When I hear discussions about constitutional protections against "ex post facto" I often smile and remember that isn't always the case.:)
     
    Top Bottom