Are you going to answer the questions?See that's what I was talking about
Are you going to answer the questions?See that's what I was talking about
How many competitors running other clinics did they shoot and kill? None? Ok. How many complaints of intimidation, "happy fire", graffiti, and other quality of life issues did their neighbors complain of? None?
Seems like a model of how the drug trade could be brought out of the black market to me.
With the prosecutor on your side, how can you fail? I'm sure the local police had no idea this was going on. After all, there were no complaints about graffiti or other quality of life issues.
What does Lee Buckingham have to do with this at present?
Are you aware that Buckinghams office is part of the drug task force responsible for these arrests, alongside the local police of CPD?Time will tell. This is probably the same group that provided Irsay with his drugs. Buckingham didn't prosecute him, so we shall see how things connect. I know Carmel is a large city, but things like this are not completely hidden.
When you're taking Percocet, take a stool softener...
Are you aware that Buckinghams office is part of the drug task force responsible for these arrests, alongside the local police of CPD?
I don't think they are less bad because they are legal; they are legal because they are less bad. I prefer chicken and egg, but horse and cart I guess tooAre you going to answer the questions?
You are throwing around a lot of really serious allegations without providing any substantive basis for them. Is there a reason for this?Covering his tracks and wanted to get rid of a good defense attorney.
You are throwing around a lot of really serious allegations without providing any substantive basis for them. Is there a reason for this?
I thought better of you than the kind of person that deals in Internet innuendo. Was I wrong? Or do you have something substantive to support your allegations?Are you in on it with them? Don't call Jesse Ventura on me, please!
Except that isn't true, which is exactly my point.I don't think they are less bad because they are legal; they are legal because they are less bad.
I thought better of you than the kind of person that deals in Internet innuendo. Was I wrong? Or do you have something substantive to support your allegations?
Ive never met Lee Buckingham but I don't know of him to be the kind of person you are describing.
Who knows, maybe the tinfoil is warranted. I just haven't seen any evidence of it in this case yet.Okay, okay, I was getting fitted for my tin foil hat, but you ruined it.
This confuses me because I am not aware of street versions of these pills, only pills that are diverted to the streets from pharmacies. Many of them are addictive which is why they are CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. When they are used in an uncontrolled environment the likelihood for abuse and addiction goes up, followed by all those things that go along with itExcept that isn't true, which is exactly my point.
The psychotropic are well on their way to being fingered for having some role in the homicidal-suicidal mass murders of late. The pain killers are as addictive as their street versions, and addicts of the legal versions are just as high, just as impaired, and just as likely to lie, cheat, steal for their drug.
Addictive pharmaceuticals. The illegal drugs. Not a literal black market manufacture of the legal ones, though that is a possibility.This confuses me because I am not aware of street versions of these pills, only pills that are diverted to the streets from pharmacies. Many of them are addictive which is why they are CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. When they are used in an uncontrolled environment the likelihood for abuse and addiction goes up, followed by all those things that go along with it
There's little practical difference in the adverse effects of the legal drugs from their illegal counterparts.