The "number of kids killed" part is where the argument falls apart. Not saying I 100% disagree, but much of the country does when it comes to defining abortion vs death.
From a moral standpoint, sure, it's something we can look at and see the hypocrisy... but it's not an argument a media outlet would present to influence opinion.
science says human life begins at conception. That is when a new, genetically distinct, human life begins. The fertilized egg is alive. It metabolizes, reproduces and adapts to its environment as opposed to being inanimate. It also cannot be another form of life since genetically it is human.
When they decided to make abortion a constitutional right WITHOUT REFERENCE TO WHEN HUMAN LIFE BEGAN, they opened themselves up to this. Roe, Casey, etc., when life begins? Irrelevant to the law. Kirk has his opinion and is free to argue based upon that.
science says human life begins at conception. That is when a new, genetically distinct, human life begins. The fertilized egg is alive. It metabolizes, reproduces and adapts to its environment as opposed to being inanimate. It also cannot be another form of life since genetically it is human.
Also, the NRA doesn't go further and sell the body parts of the dead kids.
That's an interesting number, 40% of the 7 million and change that they give to politicians comes straight out of tax money. All of us are funding politicians that they like and are paying to advance their agenda. Sounds like a well worked out kickback scheme.
They're both sad right?
My father (who's almost 70) has a far greater legacy than both.
Doesn't look that old and feeble in the second photo.