I voted pragmatically for Romney. And I tried to talk the "principled" voters into doing the same. But in the end, I just have to shake the dust from my boots and move on. Those people didn't vote for Romney because they didn't see him as any more reliable on guns than Obama. Romney didn't win and as much that remains to be seen in what Romney would have done, I think most people would think Obama did worse than Romney would have. I think I was more correct about the inevitability of things. But I didn't have crystal ball to tell me I was right. Events had to make that evident.
If you want gun control, and you vote for candidates who want gun control, you voted your conscience. But I'm going to blame you for opposing my right to bear arms.
If you don't want gun control, and you don't vote for someone who wants gun control. I'm not going to blame you for being wrong.
I'm not saying people aren't responsible for how they vote. I am saying that the Puritans have as much right to their principles as I have to my pragmatism. You don't live in a vacuum either. If you want to speak of inevitable results and principles, we can talk about your seemingly unquestionable support for Trump despite the many warnings that he's not what you think. We both believe different things about that. Should I blame you if Trump is elected and you turn out to be wrong? Should I blame you if Hillary gets elected because your unquestioning support of Trump helped him defeat candidates who would stand a better chance against her?
I probably might say I told you so, but I'm probably not going to blame you for exercising your conscience.
Trump is the only candidate that I know of who has advocated for a one time 10% net worth tax, that's even further to the left of Clinton and Sanders. There are times where Trump makes Clinton look like a moderate or even a Republican.