I was talking about verbage, not physical action. I probably shouldn't assume everyone knows the difference.
It just depends whether you believe he was telling the truth or not. The man has a reputation very similar to Bill Clinton.
I was talking about verbage, not physical action. I probably shouldn't assume everyone knows the difference.
So we are supposed to be shocked and surprised that someone finally replies in kind to the treatment they are receiving?
Really?
What treatment? Specifically what treatment?
OK.
Back to my question, though. Should Trump and Trump supporters be going after GOP members that are up for reelection? Which would result in more Democrats in power with Clinton.
If GOP members attack the GOP candidate for presidency then I think they are fair game.
There are 3 scenarios, broadly speaking, for GOP members
1. Unconditionally Support Trump
2. Conditionally Support Trump. Emphasize areas of agreement. Downplay areas of disagreement w/o compromising one's belief. Overall emphasize overall support for Trump over Hillary.
3. Disavow Trump.
As for Trump Supporters and Trumps reaction to these scenarios.
1. Reciprocate the support
2. Emphasize areas of agreement.
3. Disavow the down party candidate.
For example, I saw Pence in the 2nd scenario over Syria. I read in the press how horrible it was for the VP and the P not to agree. That kind of thinking is not healthy in my opinion.
I like to remain firmly in camp 2, not just in politics, but in all areas of life in general.
So how would this work?
Example 1: I have heard Trump speak about X. His solution would be Y. I agree that X is a problem facing the country. In order to support Y I would need to further investigate option Z, which I have supported in the past and see where Y and Z intersect. Perhaps in further discussions, we can take the best of both and advance and option W.
Example 2: I too have heard the tape. I want to hear what Trump says about the tape before responding.....
Having heard the tape, I also heard Trump apologize for what was said. I too have said some things I wish I could have taken back and apologized in the past. I believe in the possibility of change in anyone. I have feared myself that i would not be forgiven for things I have done and i will not do that to another human being.
I have been stewing for about an hour on how to respond to GP in a manner GP deserves..Well thought out, not snarky, articulate and honest.....For now on I am just going to wait for foszoe's post.....He says what I am trying to say but in a much more level headed fashion than I ever could...
Nice response sir....
I have been stewing for about an hour on how to respond to GP in a manner GP deserves..Well thought out, not snarky, articulate and honest.....For now on I am just going to wait for foszoe's post.....He says what I am trying to say but in a much more level headed fashion than I ever could...
Nice response sir....
If GOP members attack the GOP candidate for presidency then I think they are fair game.
Where's the fun in that?
What about my question wouldn't illicit a level-headed response? It seemed like a pretty simple question.
Who's this "We" you be talking about White Man?
Where's the fun in that?
I addressed that a little bit upthread. Throwing support to and promising to vote for hitlary etc.
How many have actually done that though? If GOP congressional candidates openly say they will vote for Hillary, I'd say they're fair game. But I could still back a candidate on my ballot who says he can't vote for either one.
.....Is a Democrat majority what's best for the country: Yes or no?