The official status update thread - I

[UncleMike]

I'm kinda surprised it's just a temp ban, I figured he would get permabanned

I agree!

I noticed the "shooter" under his name earlier but missed the thread in question. Perma?

https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...n/121955-f_o_p_pays_bisard_s_bill_wow-13.html

 

[Cru]

Shooter McGavin?

 

[rmabrey]

im pretty sure he started an apology thread after he posted in the one mike linked

 

[rmabrey]

https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/break_room/130498-i_was_wrong.html

 

[MrsGungho]

wow

 

[Expat]

I posted in his apology thread this morning. He should have just left it with his first post of an apology. But he had to bring up the admin again and make a comment with an obvious tone... I wondered if it would bring consequences... apparently it did.

 

[Expat]

Ah, I see rmabrey posted it while I was typing.

 

[Cru]

he didn't say he was glad the LEO was shot. I dunno, I guess I don't see the big deal. Maybe I read it wrong.

 

[UncleMike]

I posted in his apology thread this morning. He should have just left it with his first post of an apology. But he had to bring up the admin again and make a comment with an obvious tone... I wondered if it would bring consequences... apparently it did.

Insert quote from Ron White here about fixing certain personality traits.

 

[rmabrey]

While the timing and choice of threads to post his original thought was poorly chosen, he had a point and everyone jumped his ass. He also had a point about the multiple neg reps from one person. Apparently you get banned for pissing off the wrong people now

 

[OneBadV8]

While the timing and choice of threads to post his original thought was poorly chosen, he had a point and everyone jumped his ass. He also had a point about the multiple neg reps from one person. Apparently you get banned for pissing off the wrong people now

Maybe... but E5Ranger has burned a lot of bridges.

 

[UncleMike]

While the timing and choice of threads to post his original thought was poorly chosen, he had a point and everyone jumped his ass. He also had a point about the multiple neg reps from one person. Apparently you get banned for pissing off the wrong people now

Read Fenways post in the apology thread again!!
I agree with him!
Some people NEVER learn from their screw ups!!

 

[Suprtek]

So how 'bout that Sanchez video huh?

 

[OneBadV8]

So how 'bout that Sanchez video huh?

That was pretty funny.... Wonder what Brunell will think about it when he sees it on youTube

 

[Suprtek]

That was pretty funny.... Wonder what Brunell will think about it when he sees it on youTube

I wonder how long it will be allowed to STAY on YouTube.

 

[Benny]

Well........
When someone rags on the site owner in a thread after getting slapped down you can expect such things to happen.

Was his rep really lowered or did a TON of people neg rep him? He said he had a gold at one point, but in order for his rep to drop that much, he would have had to get neg reps probably over 100 times.

 

[UncleMike]

Was his rep really lowered or did a TON of people neg rep him? He said he had a gold at one point, but in order for his rep to drop that much, he would have had to get neg reps probably over 100 times.

Don't know!

 

[Expat]

Was his rep really lowered or did a TON of people neg rep him? He said he had a gold at one point, but in order for his rep to drop that much, he would have had to get neg reps probably over 100 times.

I wondered about that too. They must have edited it to drop that much, unless the admin can adjust his rep powers to whatever he wants. Or maybe he can neg rep 100 times in a row.

 

[rmabrey]

Was his rep really lowered or did a TON of people neg rep him? He said he had a gold at one point, but in order for his rep to drop that much, he would have had to get neg reps probably over 100 times.

Fenway used his admin powers and neg repped him more than once. I would guess its safe to assume that his neg reps are pretty powerful

 

[Suprtek]

I think I just hacked up a chunk of lung....but I got pownage.