The Libertarian Party Race is Filling Up?

[BugI02]

Weld wasn't my first choice, but his selection is not going to sway me to vote for that turd Trump or Hillary. I'll still cast a vote for Johnson. VP doesn't make much of an impact on a race or a presidency and Weld has already said he regrets his past actions and agrees with Heller and that gun ownership is an individual right. You republicans got over Romney's actions and you're ignoring Trumps past positions, so I'd say Weld is a pretty safe bet. I'll trust libertarians to protect my rights before I'd trust a republican or democrat.

Weld changed his former position? Obviously a lying con man

 

[BugI02]

There's more than one choice, or are not paying attention? The LP has a better stance onthe 2nd than republicans or their dem buddies. I'll take my chances with people who actually support the 2nd as it reads.

Trump has a better stance on 2A than republicans or their dem buddies
Then you go 'but he's changed his position and has no record of actually doing anything pro-2A'
And this differs from ex-NM gov and ex-MA gov precisely how?
Do either Johnson or Weld have a permit and carry?

 

[BugI02]

Super PAC money being made available to Johnson's race.

Libertarian ticket will get super-PAC support | TheHill

Well if they can't get Romney to take one for the team The Establishment have to dupe somebody into carrying their water.


[video=youtube;MWtUVDG5M1w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWtUVDG5M1w[/video]

 

[Tombs]

Trump has a better stance on 2A than republicans or their dem buddies
Then you go 'but he's changed his position and has no record of actually doing anything pro-2A'
And this differs from ex-NM gov and ex-MA gov precisely how?
Do either Johnson or Weld have a permit and carry?

It's all about branding.

 

[Jludo]

Trump has a better stance on 2A than republicans or their dem buddies
Then you go 'but he's changed his position and has no record of actually doing anything pro-2A'
And this differs from ex-NM gov and ex-MA gov precisely how?
Do either Johnson or Weld have a permit and carry?

Trumps stance is telling you whatever it takes to get elected, what his stance will be tomorrow is anyone's guess. He's about only one person, always has been. Snake oil salesmen always manage to find someone who's buying.

 

[Dead Duck]

It's all about branding.

 

[mrjarrell]

Not a bad start.

 

[Expat]

And there we have it, Hillary is the next POTUS.

 

[Jludo]

And there we have it, Hillary is the next POTUS.

Because Trump can't swindle more than 31% of the population. Republican primary voters gotta get better at picking protest candidates.

 

[Dead Duck]

Because Trump can't swindle more than 31% of the population. Republican primary voters gotta get better at picking protest candidates.

And still it wouldn't make any sense to you guys to call a truce and merge our armies together so that we both can slay the big ugly giant that's threatening our worlds?

You know, Strategy?

 

[Jludo]

And still it wouldn't make any sense to you guys to call a truce and merge our armies together so that we both can slay the big ugly giant that's threatening our worlds?

You know, Strategy?

Nothing will ever change if we continue with this nonsense. Eventually we'll have to start voting for the guy we want to win, might as well start now.
One day we'll realize 'the next election' is never going to come, that voting for the slightly less despicable character get's us absolutely nowhere.

But hey, attend Trump University if you'd like. (It's like drinking cool-aid but the charismatic leader doesn't die, just get's richer and more famous)

 

[bwframe]

And still it wouldn't make any sense to you guys to call a truce and merge our armies together so that we both can slay the big ugly giant that's threatening our worlds?

You know, Strategy?

They'll never give in. The Libertarian stance has always been to whine about everyone else. If they chose to side with someone who could actually win, they'd be held accountable for it. Whining ends when it's your own fault. Libertarians feel they are never at fault.

 

[Jludo]

They'll never give in. The Libertarian stance has always been to whine about everyone else. If they chose to side with someone who could actually win, they'd be held accountable for it. Whining ends when it's your own fault. Libertarians feel they are never at fault.

Or Trump is ideologically opposed to nearly everything libertarians stand for and instead we're voting for the successful two term Republican governor of a blue state....It's one or the other...

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Or Trump is ideologically opposed to nearly everything libertarians stand for and instead we're voting for the successful two term Republican governor of a blue state....It's one or the other...

The Libertarian candidate is more Conservative than Trump. I wonder why all the "Well he's our guy" Trump supporters aren't jumping ship for an actual Conservative-minded candidate?

Hmm. Odd, that.

 

[foszoe]

Because Trump can't swindle more than 31% of the population. Republican primary voters gotta get better at picking protest candidates.

More like because Johnson can't get 40% of the vote

 

[foszoe]

The Libertarian candidate is more Conservative than Trump. I wonder why all the "Well he's our guy" Trump supporters aren't jumping ship for an actual Conservative-minded candidate?

Hmm. Odd, that.

When was the last time a primary produced an outsider candidate?

 

[HoughMade]

Or Trump is ideologically opposed to nearly everything libertarians stand for....

Wait...you were able to discern Trump's ideology? Impressive.

 

[bwframe]

...we're voting for the successful two term Republican governor of a blue state....It's one or the other...

You're voting for Hilary, her Supreme Court appointments and the rest of our lives under gun control. That's what you're voting for.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

You're voting for Hilary, her Supreme Court appointments and the rest of our lives under gun control. That's what you're voting for.

Or voting for Trump. Don't avoid what I'm saying here... why do you default a non R/D vote to be for Clinton?

 

[bwframe]

...why do you default a non R/D vote to be for Clinton?

It's terribly simple. Not even about R/D. Any vote that is not for someone who could actually beat Hillary is essentially a vote for her.

It's no different with those who abstain. We can either beat her or stand back and let her win, just like we did with Obama.