Yep. Makes you wonder how many windowless white vans are parked in the teachers' lot at some of the schools pushing this crap.Any sentence that starts with "you don't need to tell your parents", should immediately be reported to parents.
In Boy Scouts, once a year we had the adult volunteers and the Scouts attend a class on protection from abuse.Yep. Makes you wonder how many windowless white vans are parked in the teachers' lot at some of the schools pushing this crap.
And we send the little darlings to the local state reprograming centers every day.I feel there’s a lot of truth in this:
Thread by @JoshDaws on Thread Reader App
@JoshDaws: I'm seeing a lot of people on the right share this meme. While it may be a strong satirical response to those who get lost in nuance, it fundamentally fails to recognize why the left wants...…threadreaderapp.com
Numbers that I pulled up today said that approx 4% of the US population is LGBSo, we're returning to the notion that homosexuals are pedophiles, are we?
I hold to a traditional Christian view of marriage and gender roles, but to me, this line of thinking is just recockulous and dangerous.
Edit: I'm far more worried about the influences of TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter than I am about a teacher. I'm sure that studies show that social media and peer pressure are key.
Funny, Ive seen far more apparently straight, sometimes married guys busted by the predator groups.Numbers that I pulled up today said that approx 4% of the US population is LGB
And a different source said 3.6% of the population had pedophile tendencies or had committed pedophilia, with 94% of those being male
Interesting correlation. I'll leave you to argue about the degree of overlap between those two groups
And a similar google search shows that 3% of the world population controls 97% of the wealth. Does that mean they are all pedos?
This is exactly what it is - insidious and intentional indoctrination.Grooming could and possibly should be replaced with indoctrinating.
The qualifier here being 'prepubescent'. Some parents appreciate schools teaching their adolescent children the facts of life because it's an uncomfortable topic. The issue has long been that schools begin that instruction earlier and earlier and now also they are 'required' to cover all variations meaning heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, ad nauseam, until they're pretty much exposing children with absolutely no sexual inclinations about some of the most outrageous and adult situations imaginable. At best I can only assume this is utter naivety on the part of teachers to think this is anything but destructive but as many here have indicated there's almost certainly an underlying motivation of indoctrination for the purposes of future sexual exploitation by others. And if even a few children fall victim to this type of behavior then in my mind it's justification for reviewing and likely discarding the entire curriculum of sexual education in favor of reference back to the parents no matter how uncomfortable the topic makes them feel. This was the entire motivation for the Florida law.It is an absolute fact. It's this simple: Should a person other than a parent be allowed to discuss sex or sexual topics with prepubescent children? If your answer is anything but an immediate and unequivocal NO then you are a part of the problem.
Agreed. As I said in my first post, I think this is a lot less about pedophilia and a lot more about liberal radicalization at an early enough age that the the kids are programmed with it and never question it.I feel there’s a lot of truth in this:
Thread by @JoshDaws on Thread Reader App
@JoshDaws: I'm seeing a lot of people on the right share this meme. While it may be a strong satirical response to those who get lost in nuance, it fundamentally fails to recognize why the left wants...…threadreaderapp.com
If I may add, in my experience, of the articles that occasionally appear in my news feed on this topic it is usually one of two groups - married middle-aged straight guys get busted trying to secret rendezvous with underage girls they met online - or - young single female teachers having sex and sometimes long-term secret relationships with their underage male students. Neither fits the profile of this being an LGBT issue.Funny, Ive seen far more apparently straight, sometimes married guys busted by the predator groups.
I find it amazing how the left used to cry about their efforts being “for the children”. Pretty tough sell on this issue, almost as if they’re a bunch of hypocrites or something.The qualifier here being 'prepubescent'. Some parents appreciate schools teaching their adolescent children the facts of life because it's an uncomfortable topic. The issue has long been that schools begin that instruction earlier and earlier and now also they are 'required' to cover all variations meaning heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, ad nauseam, until they're pretty much exposing children with absolutely no sexual inclinations about some of the most outrageous and adult situations imaginable. At best I can only assume this is utter naivety on the part of teachers to think this is anything but destructive but as many here have indicated there's almost certainly an underlying motivation of indoctrination for the purposes of future sexual exploitation by others. And if even a few children fall victim to this type of behavior then in my mind it's justification for reviewing and likely discarding the entire curriculum of sexual education in favor of reference back to the parents no matter how uncomfortable the topic makes them feel. This was the entire motivation for the Florida law.
Yes, their hypocrisy has reached new levels of transparency yet the sheeple refuse to acknowledge it.I find it amazing how the left used to cry about their efforts being “for the children”. Pretty tough sell on this issue, almost as if they’re a bunch of hypocrites or something.