-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
The insane social justice thread
- Thread starter jamil
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
ChristianPatriot
Grandmaster
I don't know. Seems to be pretty effective at pushing an agenda.
There's a Voddie Vaucham quote that I particularly like. It goes something like, "The 11th commandment is thou shalt be nice, and we don't believe the other ten."
Double stupid here.
1. The theater boycotting a movie for a gay character. This is dumb
2. The SJW crowd setting up the targets on this theater to receive harassment.
Alabama movie theater boycotting Disney’s ‘Beauty And The Beast’ over its new gay character | Fusion
1. The theater boycotting a movie for a gay character. This is dumb
2. The SJW crowd setting up the targets on this theater to receive harassment.
Alabama movie theater boycotting Disney’s ‘Beauty And The Beast’ over its new gay character | Fusion
Bake a cake all over again.
But... let's not make those Rockettes dance for Trump if they don't want to.
Did I get it right?
His theater, his choice.
As awash we are in all sorts of other degenerate trash that passes and entertainment theses days, I gotta wonder why this is a bridge too far for so many.
Last edited:
Because the gay. Some people are just way too worried about that.
I couldn't care one whit less whether there's a gay character in a movie or play or whatever, nor if the actor playing or voicing a character is gay. Don't get behind me, and we won't have a problem.
The reason it's a problem is because if we allow it for something we don't like, there is no ground to stand on when something we do like is opposed. Suppose a (liberal) theater owner prevented the showing of a movie or a play because a character or an actor opposed abortion (and yes, I chose that for my example because I know it's an important topic to you.) It's the owner's choice to do that or not, as you said, but that doesn't mean people won't voice objection to his choices.
Blessings,
Bill
The reason it's a problem is because if we allow it for something we don't like, there is no ground to stand on when something we do like is opposed. Suppose a (liberal) theater owner prevented the showing of a movie or a play because a character or an actor opposed abortion (and yes, I chose that for my example because I know it's an important topic to you.) It's the owner's choice to do that or not, as you said, but that doesn't mean people won't voice objection to his choices.
Blessings,
Bill
If people want to expose their kids to this sort of stuff and desenstize them towards this behavior, there's theaters that will oblige them...they can have at it. Raise your kids however you want. Personally, I believe Jesus when He said it woud be better for you to have a mill stone tied around your neck and be thrown in the ocean than lead the young ones astray...I'll no longer be a party to it and I commend other folks for taking a stand. Having said that, and here's where I get really cynical, plenty of us "religious people" have become quite comfortable with adultery, out-of-wedlock-sex, promiscuity, divorce, and plenty of other types of sexual immorality being portrayed in a postive light, as a normal and even preferred way of life in our entertainment and even in our daily lives...we'll get used to a couple of homosexuals kissing on TV and/or the movie screen soon enough.
(Disclaimer). I don't care if the actor's homosexual. We're all sinners and I know that any number of my behaviors, on any given day, are repugnant to God. I am no better a person. Probably even this exchange, or my conduct in it anyway, is not pleasing to Him.
Last edited:
Supreme Court sends transgender case back to lower court - CNNPolitics.com
SCOTUS order means there is no injunction in teen’s favor. Can try in court again w/o benefit of Obama guidance.
SCOTUS order means there is no injunction in teen’s favor. Can try in court again w/o benefit of Obama guidance.
Last edited:
Maybe she doesn't identify as a brawny woman though. 
Brawny Man is now Brawny Woman.
Hilarious that they think this is social justice progress... helping women break the glass ceiling of being associated with housecleaning.
@NameIsJosephine said:I told my sister to write an essay on the wage gap for her class & this is her professor's reply
https://twitter.com/NameIsJosephine/status/838785189513998336
Only seek out feminist information for this feminist talking point, that's how research is done!
Maybe she doesn't identify as a brawny woman though.
Did you just assume the aforementioned "Brawny Woman"'s gender?
GP started it!!!
Fine, but the only sandwich fit for a forum moderator...
I think that looks tasty.
Fine, but the only sandwich fit for a forum moderator...
No bacon??? And you call yourself an INGOer??? Where's that blasted infraction button? *munches sammich*
- Status
Site Supporter
Members online
- flint stonez
- HoughMade
- Chalky
- mondoreli
- XDdreams
- bstewrat3
- swamptick
- 12many
- bulldogs42
- Steve
- Old Bear
- bwframe
- Bulletb5
- loudgroove
- indyblue
- manifest destiny
- Ark
- Jmtbug21
- d.kaufman
- akethan
- INgunowner
- H&SFarms
- Mikey1911
- tbhausen
- HKFaninCarmel
- GasTube138
- 06ackley
- rkwhyte2
- TheSpookyCat
- archer_advice
- stale_ranch
- citizenkane
- Whitey
- dweezil
- wtburnette
- wtfd661
- junglerogue
- JettaKnight
- Bstarkey_46947
- dak109
- cigarman454
- Wolfhound
- ditcherman
- PLANEMECH
- markiemark
- Firehawk
- texkev
- singlesix
- OneBadV8
- ECS686