Nah, more better without direction. You can make it up as you go along. POTUS doesn't have to follow the rulings of a lower court, if the lawyers from the DOJ can ignore a Federal District Court judge.Sorta. The 4-4 tie means the injunction remains in place. However, it also means important parts of the order are subject to revision, including the scope. Would've been good to have some direction from the court.
Your new nobilityObama speaking/berating us now, says Supreme Court move on immigration "takes us further from the country we aspire to be"
Who's this "we"?
Obama speaking/berating us now, says Supreme Court move on immigration "takes us further from the country we aspire to be"
Who's this "we"?
Obama speaking/berating us now, says Supreme Court move on immigration "takes us further from the country we aspire to be"
Who's this "we"?
I think it is truly pathetic that the court votes along party lines the way it does. They are not judging on constitutionality, they are judging on pure opinion.Sorta. The 4-4 tie means the injunction remains in place. However, it also means important parts of the order are subject to revision, including the scope. Would've been good to have some direction from the court.
I heard on a talk show that Obama was basically saying the result was illegitimate because the Senate is blocking his appointment.Hmmm.. wonder if that same holds true for the other 4-4 ties....
i suspect if they had a full court they might hear it.