The Hillary Clinton’s Private E-mail thread

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • two70

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    19   0   0
    Feb 5, 2016
    3,910
    113
    Johnson
    There is no false equivalence except in the minds of partisans.

    Sure there is. False equivalence is a regular ploy of those with an agenda to push and a trap for those unwilling to tell good from bad or bad from worse as the case may be.

    Case in point: Bush had the Democrats and media trying to tear him down for 8 years and in the end they had to resort to demonstrably false reports as the best line of attack. Conversely, Obama and Hillary have been involved in a long series of scandals and corruption (Fast and Furious, Solyndra, Iran Nuclear deal, Ben Ghazi, Hillary's homebrew server, the Clinton Family Foundation, etc.) for which not even the media could fully hide from the light of day. Yet, people often try to draw a false equivalence between Bush and Obama or Hillary. Bush made plenty of mistakes/decisions to complain about but to equate those mistakes to the deliberate circumvention of the law and corruption as Obama and Hillary have done is lazy thought at best or purposeful intellectual dishonesty at worst.

    Surely you are not also implying that you are not a partisan?
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    Sure there is. False equivalence is a regular ploy of those with an agenda to push and a trap for those unwilling to tell good from bad or bad from worse as the case may be.

    Case in point: Bush had the Democrats and media trying to tear him down for 8 years and in the end they had to resort to demonstrably false reports as the best line of attack. Conversely, Obama and Hillary have been involved in a long series of scandals and corruption (Fast and Furious, Solyndra, Iran Nuclear deal, Ben Ghazi, Hillary's homebrew server, the Clinton Family Foundation, etc.) for which not even the media could fully hide from the light of day. Yet, people often try to draw a false equivalence between Bush and Obama or Hillary. Bush made plenty of mistakes/decisions to complain about but to equate those mistakes to the deliberate circumvention of the law and corruption as Obama and Hillary have done is lazy thought at best or purposeful intellectual dishonesty at worst.

    Surely you are not also implying that you are not a partisan?

    This isn't about Bush, it's about both parties egregious behaviours over the course of many decades. If you think that these abuses do not apply to the reigns of republicans and democrats equally then you're part of the problem. Both parties are corrupt and have done more than their fair share to meet the train of abuses. Was Bush just as guilty as his predecessor? Absolutely. And the guy that came before him was equally as bad. They are all abusive where we are concerned.

    He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
    He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
    He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
    He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
    He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
    He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
    He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
    He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
    He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
    He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
    He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
    He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
    He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
    For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
    For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
    For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
    For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
    For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
    For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
    For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
    For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
    For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
    He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
    He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
    He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
    He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
    He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,729
    113
    Uranus
    Good thing Bush is running for president now huh?
    We should excuse clinton because bush. Never break the cycle. Good Call.
     

    zippy23

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    May 20, 2012
    1,815
    63
    Noblesville
    It is now fully out in the open that our gov't is openly corrupt, and willing to do nothing those in gov't who have broken the law. The FBI director admits she had tons of classified emails, he admits she broke the rules, then makes up some crap on intent(which isnt in any of those rules) and she walks free. She is knowingly and purposefully put out nation at risk to hide her emails form the public. Yes gov't is corrupt, its been that way for a long long long time sure, but this is an huge public middle finger to the people. At this point i think the election will end in hilary winning by a small margin because of fraud. I think if it were true, trump would win hands down, by a ridiculous margin. Our gov't is so corrupt and evil, and now they are just out in the open about it. what can we do(without saying things to get banned from ingo)?
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    It is now fully out in the open that our gov't is openly corrupt, and willing to do nothing those in gov't who have broken the law. The FBI director admits she had tons of classified emails, he admits she broke the rules, then makes up some crap on intent(which isnt in any of those rules) and she walks free. She is knowingly and purposefully put out nation at risk to hide her emails form the public. Yes gov't is corrupt, its been that way for a long long long time sure, but this is an huge public middle finger to the people. At this point i think the election will end in hilary winning by a small margin because of fraud. I think if it were true, trump would win hands down, by a ridiculous margin. Our gov't is so corrupt and evil, and now they are just out in the open about it. what can we do(without saying things to get banned from ingo)?

    So that leaves us with "fair play" Trump? Honest Donald.... he'd never engaged in such shenanigans. Lol
     

    foxxie02

    Marksman
    Rating - 97.2%
    35   1   0
    May 23, 2008
    250
    18
    like someones sign line.. if you are mad as heck and run out into the street screaming and you are the only one. its not time yet.. :) corruption in government, no !!!
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,218
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    Remember when a missing 18 minutes of audio tape was enough to fuel a chain of events and even a slime-ball like Nixon was at least decent enough to have enough shame to resign and leave than drag the country down any further than he had?

    Yeah, but that boat sank with Nixon. You notice Slick Willy didn't take that path; neither has Lese Majeste Obama. Why would anyone think Hillary would be any different?
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    26,157
    149
    No surprises here

    US Attorney General Loretta Lynch says no criminal charges to be filed in Hillary Clinton email investigation
    Boy they had one slick operation wrapping this one up like it was all planned.

    Lynch all of a sudden announces that she'll accept the recommendations from the FBI and career prosecutors then Comey follows up with his schtick and Lynch closes the book with the announcement of no criminal charges then runs out the back door and jumps into the waiting getaway car.
     
    Top Bottom