After ending his primary challenge to President Trump, Joe Walsh says he will vote Democrat in 2020:
“I would rather have a socialist in the White House than a dictator."
... You're going to vote out a dictator? Do you hear yourself? Like, at all?
After ending his primary challenge to President Trump, Joe Walsh says he will vote Democrat in 2020:
“I would rather have a socialist in the White House than a dictator."
... You're going to vote out a dictator? Do you hear yourself? Like, at all?
Was he ever a republican? That is a crazy statement but the dumbmasses will never get it...
This is true. The evidence of this is that public imposed term limits have never happened historically.I don't believe something that doesn't work in the real world is a solution.
If you have a flat tire, and an air compressor, you have the solution.
Choosing not to do that doesn't change that.
Term limits will only help if you can apply it to all government work. Without chasing the rest of the government out you will just institutionalize a "government" that does what it wants and simply waits until the next election. Call it deep state or whatever.
After ending his primary challenge to President Trump, Joe Walsh says he will vote Democrat in 2020:
“I would rather have a socialist in the White House than a dictator."
... You're going to vote out a dictator? Do you hear yourself? Like, at all?
After ending his primary challenge to President Trump, Joe Walsh says he will vote Democrat in 2020:
“I would rather have a socialist in the White House than a dictator."
... You're going to vote out a dictator? Do you hear yourself? Like, at all?
Or, he knows history better than you do. Lol
There has been more than one dictator that has been voted out of power. I think part of the issue, is that people default dictator to also mean tyrant. Which isn't true.
This is a really good point. Once the executive branch's bureaucracies are led by people who've been there 4 decades, I think it's natural for them to become more entrenched and even corrupt, and a deep state can form. It may be that it's not a question of is there a deep state. Maybe the question is how can there not be? So maybe more of the senior positions need to be appointments.
And for crying out loud, public unions have to go. That's the most absurd sheep**** ever. It's like the rank and file wolves bargaining with the pack leaders about divvying up the sheep's resources.
It would be hard for the bureaucracy to function if you swapped all or most of them out every four to eight years. Of course that could be a feature. It has become much too large and powerful in this country.Civil service protections have arguably outlived their usefulness. Without all of that dreck, you wouldn't have to make more positions appointments. You would make everybody serve at the pleasure of the president
It would be hard for the bureaucracy to function if you swapped all or most of them out every four to eight years. Of course that could be a feature. It has become much too large and powerful in this country.
If you have a flat tire, and an air compressor, you have the solution.
Choosing not to do that doesn't change that.
Or, he knows history better than you do. Lol
There has been more than one dictator that has been voted out of power. I think part of the issue, is that people default dictator to also mean tyrant. Which isn't true.
Civil service protections have arguably outlived their usefulness. Without all of that dreck, you wouldn't have to make more positions appointments. You would make everybody serve at the pleasure of the president
Having a complete turnover of government with each administration would be a cluster****. Also, I think there would be a lot of abuse of that power. I'm fine with just turning over the thing at a higher level.
Having a complete turnover of government with each administration would be a cluster****. Also, I think there would be a lot of abuse of that power. I'm fine with just turning over the thing at a higher level.
There are cabinet heads and undersecretaries and deputies that get appointed. Below them are the career people who really run the departments. I think it would be fine for those people to decide that the career management should go. But below that, nah. Unless they’re not doing the job their manager tells them to do, they’d be immune from administration changes.#1913, and 'advise and [STRIKE]obstruct[/STRIKE] consent' would just be even more of a nightmare. Below the level of head of an organization, it should be like a business, if you don't do what you're told your future is freed up