The [Current Year] General Political/Salma Hayek discussion thread, part 4!!!

[Fargo]

What position would that be? The fetal position?

He's in the break room whining about how this thread is cancer. Despite your white knighting on his behalf, there is nothing inaccurate in what I posted. I remember the back and forth from the 2016 political season in this subforum, hence the Nate Silver reference.

Not sure which "clique" I belong to, but whichever one it it, I never received my membership card. I'm hoping it's the one that doesn't get their little feelings hurt over a joke. Because of all the things we may need in this tumultuous time in our nation's history, I'm betting that fragility isn't one of them.

Weren't you one of the leaders of the Kut-is-a-mean-ol-troll whingefest in the now locked shooter thread?

 

[bwframe]

 

[nonobaddog]

That is just weird. Kind of the opposite of 'hot pants'.

 

[bacon#1]

Great now I want one of those. Looks like a good cure for W.I.B.S. and Swass!

 

[nonobaddog]

Probably be great for motocross racers. They get 'monkeybutt' from riding so much.

 

[Route 45]

 

[Route 45]

Oh, the old motte and bailey fallacy..."I can't honestly defend my behavior, so I'll claim it's a joke." Classic!

Aren't jokes supposed to have an element of humor?

You float snide comments about long standing members of INGO to try to elevate your position among strangers...that isn't joking, its bullying and it is childish.

You don't like what he says? Tear down his arguments.

You don't like him? Put him on "ignore".

White knighting...lol, you're being a dick to my friend, and I'm calling you out for it. Get your head out of your ass for a change, man...fragility isn't the problem, a lack of civility and respect is.

You're part of that problem.

Wow.

 

[PaulF]

Wow.

Lol. Is that the best you can do? You really don't do well without someone else's pre-chewed opinion to regurgitate, do you?

Here, give me a minute. I'll write a retort for you and PM it to you so you don't look completely defeated.

 

[Route 45]

Lol. Is that the best you can do? You really don't do well without someone else's pre-chewed opinion to regurgitate, do you?

Here, give me a minute. I'll write a retort for you and PM it to you so you don't look completely defeated.

Don't bother, hero. I'm headed out for the day. Too nice outside to spend any more time arguing with someone who thinks they are "defeating" people on the internet.

 

[KLB]

Is this about the troll?

No.

 

[PaulF]

Don't bother, hero. I'm headed out for the day. Too nice outside to spend any more time arguing with someone who thinks they are "defeating" people on the internet.

Yeah, I should have used "outmatched" instead, but I didn't want to be cruel.

Sure, take your ball and go away...the world is full of puppies to kick.

You sure don't seem to like it when things get personal toward you...maybe there's a lesson in there somewhere.

 

[nonobaddog]

Yeah, I should have used "outmatched" instead, but I didn't want to be cruel.

Sure, take your ball and go away...the world is full of puppies to kick.

You sure don't seem to like it when things get personal toward you...maybe there's a lesson in there somewhere.

You are the one pushing the argument - take a Midol.

 

[PaulF]

You are the one pushing the argument - take a Midol.

Just illustrating a point, my friend...that this type of thing is pointless, counterproductive even, and should have no place on INGO.

I'm glad to see you agree.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

Just illustrating a point, my friend...that this type of thing is pointless, counterproductive even, and should have no place on INGO.

I'm glad to see you agree.

Arent you doing the very thing you’re claiming to be against? You also have a ignore, so if you don’t like what he’s saying use your own advice. And you can throw a fit all you want, there almost always seems to be the same person involved. This has already been discussed, nobody wants to see him gone, but when he pokes the dogs with a stick don’t get upset and defend him when the dogs occasionally bark and bite. Part of it.

So... back to politics.

 

[printcraft]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/1/us-really-did-have-manchurian-candidate-white-hous/

obama explained.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Arent you doing the very thing you’re claiming to be against? You also have a ignore, so if you don’t like what he’s saying use your own advice. And you can throw a fit all you want, there almost always seems to be the same person involved. This has already been discussed, nobody wants to see him gone, but when he pokes the dogs with a stick don’t get upset and defend him when the dogs occasionally bark and bite. Part of it.

So... back to politics.

lol

 

[d.kaufman]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/1/us-really-did-have-manchurian-candidate-white-hous/

obama explained.

Every bit of it true!

 

[KJQ6945]

We had name calling better than I've seen in years, and nothing.


Kut, this is why you get blamed for the shooters. The last guy banned didnt say half what Paul has.

 

[Kutnupe14]

We had name calling better than I've seen in years, and nothing.


Kut, this is why you get blamed for the shooters. The last guy banned didnt say half what Paul has.

 

[bwframe]