Ah, right. It is difficult for me to see an Indiana state court, let alone the ct. of appeals, following that line of divergent authority from a federal court of appeals in an separate district. Indiana courts are more likely (in my experience) to follow the factors articulated by the Indiana Supreme Court. Like they should.
I know of no Indiana state court decision aligned with that 4th circuit (federal) case, but I am open to correction on it.
My purpose wasn't to claim that 4DCA had jurisdiction over Indiana, but rather to point out that there are prosecutors, and courts, in the US who are making such arguments. I think it is naive and foolish to believe that (some) prosecutors and/or courts in Indiana wouldn't attempt to do the same, if given the opportunity. We already know that ISA holds to the beliefs espoused in the referenced 4DCA opinion.