It's kind of hard for a law abiding citizen to stop a mass shooting because they're all happening in gun free zone.Just heard a fellow on the news say that,no armed citizen has ever stopped a mass shooting. Is he correct? Just curious.
This trend will continue, because it makes for almost guaranteed success.The only guarantee is that gun free zones seem to be popular target zines for mass shooters.
Just heard a fellow on the news say that,no armed citizen has ever stopped a mass shooting. Is he correct? Just curious.
Who cares? Are you going to stop carrying, or owning a gun because it has or hasn't made a difference? What about tomorrow, when it may make a difference, if only for you and yours? If you are looking at stats, YOU, aren't training enough to be THE DIFFERENCE! No one, but YOU, can be responsible for what happens to you and yours!Just heard a fellow on the news say that,no armed citizen has ever stopped a mass shooting. Is he correct? Just curious.
Ancillary question: Is there a protection for a citizen who is trying to stop a nut job? In other words, if you draw to protect others and someone gets hit by accident what happens? Do law enforcement have a protection, legally, from an accident in the face of that kind of incident?
a reverse "Good Samaritan" law
If a mass shooting was stopped by an armed citizen you can be sure that:
1) It ended up NOT being a mass shooting.
2) It's therefore NOT newsworthy.
Indeed the "news" these days is not news at all but simply liberal-leftist propaganda. They just lie to suit their narrative.
BTW, you have noticed, I hope, that those people intent on committing mass murder tend to prefer GUN FREE ZONES. Since legal gun carriers are very VERY careful to obey the law, there is a very small likelihood that a legally carried gun is present at a gun free zone mass shooting. But then the liberal-leftist propaganda talking heads know that, it's a part of the plan.