Nope, just repeating the republican at all cost logic.
Why does that not apply to Lugar but does to Romney? What anti 2A stuff has Lugar done that Romney hasn't?
Romney isn't running against Lugar last I checked. Mourdock is.
Nope, just repeating the republican at all cost logic.
Why does that not apply to Lugar but does to Romney? What anti 2A stuff has Lugar done that Romney hasn't?
Romney isn't running against Lugar last I checked. Mourdock is.
Why do you have to derail every discussion with this meme?
....just pure stirring the
If Lugar's anti gun stances are so bad that it would cause one to vote democrat in that election, wouldn't the same hold true for all offices?
Nope. Both R and D presidential candidates suck on that point. There isn't really an alternative on this issue.
A strong pro 2A congress can keep in check a lot of the anti 2A crap that would come out of the executive. Not ideal, I know, but appears to be the reality of our situation.
If Lugar's anti gun stances are so bad that it would cause one to vote democrat in that election, wouldn't the same hold true for all offices?
And with a Reid in control of the senate, no pro gun legislation is going to come forth.
I'm just trying to see if repubs are going to follow out their logic. We were told that we HAD to vote for Coats so that a dem wouldn't be in control as the majority party. Now, that logic isn't so sound?
and what is the "a vote for a third party is a vote for a democrat" meme? How long can a Paul thread go on without the haters showing up?
ARe we closer to the pubbies being a majority party with Coates in office, or with a Dem in his place. I know that is a difficult question but do your best.
Are we closer to being a majority party with Lugar in office or the democrat?
We were told the candidate didn't matter during the coats race, the party did. Now, it seems some will go ahead and vote democrat instead of Lugar.
Of course this is predicated on Lugar winning the primary. The point I'm making is that so many show hatred for Lugar now but will be demanding that I vote for him this November should he win the primary. Just trying to keep up with the logic is all.
I didn't vote for lugar 6 years ago !
If tactical voting and Washington control are your endgame, I honestly don't understand the push to oust Lugar. This isn't a flippant comment that usually is bandied about in these threads, it is honest doubt. Lugar is connected, wrote the book on nuclear treaties, and statistically the epitome of a Republican voter. Why foul up a near sure thing with uncertainties of Donnelly versus Murdock? Why remove the kingmaker for a freshman?
Are we closer to being a majority party with Lugar in office or the democrat?
We were told the candidate didn't matter during the coats race, the party did. Now, it seems some will go ahead and vote democrat instead of Lugar.
Of course this is predicated on Lugar winning the primary. The point I'm making is that so many show hatred for Lugar now but will be demanding that I vote for him this November should he win the primary. Just trying to keep up with the logic is all.
Are we closer to being a majority party with Lugar in office or the democrat?
We were told the candidate didn't matter during the coats race, the party did. Now, it seems some will go ahead and vote democrat instead of Lugar.
Of course this is predicated on Lugar winning the primary. The point I'm making is that so many show hatred for Lugar now but will be demanding that I vote for him this November should he win the primary. Just trying to keep up with the logic is all.
I thought you were a Losertarian? No, they aren't a majority party. Don't you have to have someone in office to even be a party?
Being on the winning anti liberty team is something to be proud of.
I'm just watching the Lugar hate getting ready to morph into Lugar love this fall. Or will Murdock win? Will he behave any differently than Lugar once in office? It all remains to be seen.