I would be sending that one back to Sig.
Agreed!
I would be sending that one back to Sig.
I saw the P365 in the range rental counter at PB in Greenwood today but will wait until Saturday morning to shoot it, if it's available then. As intrigued as I am with this, I don't think that this would replace my P938, even with the capacity. I don't do EDC with small guns. I'll always opt for at least a mid-size gun for my EDC and I have those bases well covered. Shooting it might change my mind on adding it to the family as a pocket gun. We'll see though
Quite confused. Many bashed the 320, yet seems the 365 is getting tons of praise. Several saying Sig doesn't make good guns anymore, they just market "lifestyle". Sig used to be highly sought after for many calibers. What happened? I am considering a 320, in .45 not 9, but hearing how they have issues, aren't good with military ball ammo. Why does it seem like everyone's excited about this Sig, but dogged the 320, and in some cases, they dog most manufacturers saying things like "they don't make good guns anymore". Well, who does make a good gun that doesn't cost $1000 these days? Since most of them went all conglomerate on us, does that mean we'll never have good guns again? Just wondering. I would think anyone who is skeptical of the 320 should be running from this too. I'm on the fence about the 320 .45 and if anyone wants to speak well of them, please convince me why, all I seem to hear these days is "New Sigs Baaad."
Isn' that a pre-order price?
Actually before sending it back to the mother ship, I would have tried a few different types of ammo. It might run better with carry ammo, compared to the Magtech "range" ammo. One cannot draw a solid conclusion based on this one test, but it is interesting. Small guns can be difficult for shooters with very large hands and for those who use the same grip and techniques that they use on full-sized guns. I'm speaking from my experience with my Kahr CM-9.I would be sending that one back to Sig.
I cancelled my P365 order with sportsman’s outdoors at $529.99 w/ free shipping because Brownells had a deal last night for the P365 for $459.99 w/ free shipping. At that price, I had to jump on it.
Actually before sending it back to the mother ship, I would have tried a few different types of ammo. It might run better with carry ammo, compared to the Magtech "range" ammo. One cannot draw a solid conclusion based on this one test, but it is interesting. Small guns can be difficult for shooters with very large hands and for those who use the same grip and techniques that they use on full-sized guns. I'm speaking from my experience with my Kahr CM-9.
I spoke with a fellow today that had just put 150 rounds through his brand new Sig P 365 and had no malfunctions. Like I said, one video isn't definitive enough to either praise or condemn any model pistol. All Kahr CM-9's are supposed to have a break-in period. My son-in-law had malfunctions with his new CM-9 until the 50 round mark; then smooth sailing. I bought my Kahr CM-9 used, so the previous owner broke it in for me. No problems with it so far. Like I said, it could be an ammo problem, since all 1,000 rounds were with one brand ammo. Undoubtedly, I wouldn't carry a pistol that had malfunctions until the problem(s) were figured out. The 1,000 round test actually left me with more questions than answers. I compared my Kahr CM-9 with the Sig P 365 today side-by-side. They are just about the same size. The P 365 is IMHO a true pocket pistol.Just seems to me that after 1000 rounds and still having a problem with it not going fully into battery that there is a problem with that particular pistol. Maybe it was large hands hitting the slide release causing an issue. I would not know about the really large hands. Maybe the fact that my hands are between medium and large is why both of my Kahr CM9's always shoot everything I feed them. From 115 grain target loads, to my 124 grain cast reloads, to my new carry ammo, 147 grain Federal HST's. I will not keep a firearm that is not reliable, so hopefully Sig gets this figured out. If it were the only time I had heard this problem with the P365, I would not think much about it. Problem is, it is not.
I compared my Kahr CM-9 with the Sig P 365 today side-by-side. They are just about the same size. The P 365 is IMHO a true pocket pistol.
I spoke with a fellow today that had just put 150 rounds through his brand new Sig P 365 and had no malfunctions. Like I said, one video isn't definitive enough to either praise or condemn any model pistol. All Kahr CM-9's are supposed to have a break-in period. My son-in-law had malfunctions with his new CM-9 until the 50 round mark; then smooth sailing. I bought my Kahr CM-9 used, so the previous owner broke it in for me. No problems with it so far. Like I said, it could be an ammo problem, since all 1,000 rounds were with one brand ammo. Undoubtedly, I wouldn't carry a pistol that had malfunctions until the problem(s) were figured out. The 1,000 round test actually left me with more questions than answers. I compared my Kahr CM-9 with the Sig P 365 today side-by-side. They are just about the same size. The P 365 is IMHO a true pocket pistol.
"The only time an aircraft has too much fuel on board is when it is on fire!" To me this carries over to magazine capacity.Being the minimal, simplistic type a guy that I am, I have, as usual, effectively talked myself out of trying one of these.
I really like my Shield, I trust my life with it and I hope I never shoot it outside of the range. And if I do, I hope I can get the job done with 2 less rounds. If not, well then game over.
So, now that I saved $500 by not buying it, i'm thinking about adding a laser to the Shield and getting Tucker to make me a new holster for it. See what I did here; I saved money!