There are a LOT of different thoughts on pretty much everything regarding prepping and survival. There is essentially no "right" or "wrong" way for most things. For the most part it's a matter of personal situation (home location, budget, etc.) weighed against what dangers someone feels to be the most likely to threaten them. Such a difference recently brought up a conversation and so I pose it here for evaluation.
The idea is that of "bugging in" vs "bugging out." The belief is that if the S was to HTF SO bad that you could not remain in place at your home where most of your supplies are and unable to defend it properly, then it is highly unlikely that you will be able to return to it at all in any sort of reasonable amount of time, if ever.
What would you say to this theory? Do you agree? Why or why not? Essentially, this would be a foundation for many of your preps. Such a belief would completely throw out the theory of the "72 hour BOB" in most cases for instance.
What say you?
The idea is that of "bugging in" vs "bugging out." The belief is that if the S was to HTF SO bad that you could not remain in place at your home where most of your supplies are and unable to defend it properly, then it is highly unlikely that you will be able to return to it at all in any sort of reasonable amount of time, if ever.
What would you say to this theory? Do you agree? Why or why not? Essentially, this would be a foundation for many of your preps. Such a belief would completely throw out the theory of the "72 hour BOB" in most cases for instance.
What say you?