IndyGunner
Master
- Dec 27, 2010
- 1,977
- 36
So nobody who voted "Yes" has the guts to stand up and say they did?
Typical.
Josh
I accidentally pressed yes LOL, didn't read the question very well apparently. Took me this long to realize it.
So nobody who voted "Yes" has the guts to stand up and say they did?
Typical.
Josh
So nobody who voted "Yes" has the guts to stand up and say they did?
Typical.
Josh
He may have seen it, but he won't be posting. Ever.I guess Dredd hasn't seen it yet.
So when did the law change that your LTCH isnt good enough to buy a gun,I just recently got my lifetime .Last time I had a carry license was about 20 years ago.Havent bought from a dealer recently so what kind of crap do you have to go through now?
Oh and I voted NO
What is wrong with having background checks to stop criminals from buying handguns at stores? If they were no background check, then it would make a little easier for criminals to get guns. Yes I know they can get them on the streets cheeper, but there are always the dumb ones that would get it at the store. If you have a clean record and obey the laws, what it the big deal of going through a background check?
No, it isn't. We're so much more progressive now....face it, this isn't 1900.
I understand that it's a supposed infringement, but is the government keeping law abiding citizens from owning guns? No, they aren't to an extent, I hate how they keep trying to talk about banning this or that, but that's all it is is talk. They can't, nor do I ever vote that way. Look, if it makes it a little harder for criminals and is for the greater good it is nothing but an inconvenience. This is coming from someone who gets delayed every time I buy a new gun. Every time. I don't know why, but I always get the ok the next day. Makes it a pain in the rear if I'm not buying local, that's for sure. Yes, I have a lifetime carry permit too, which makes even more ridiculous, but it's for the greater good. Why do we have speed limits? For the greater good. Why do we have laws about being under the influence and driving? For the greater good. Also that crack about drinking as a teenager, no it doesn't stop anybody, but it does make it more difficult for teens to drink. It's for the greater good. Slander if you want, I don't care, but I don't have a problem with it. I will if they ever think they can come take them away.
We don't have background checks to exercise the 1st Amendment.
We don't have background checks to exercise the 1st Amendment.
Nothing....criminals still get their hands on firearms.
...But immagine for a second what would happen if the requirement were to be taken away.
Nothing.What would prevent a violent criminal from walking into a Walmart and buying a shotgun.
Nothing.What would stop a gang member from walking into a gun shop and buying a new pistol?
...i see more problems by removing the requirement than there are with the requirement enforced.