How so? When the committees that must hear the bill to vote it to second, then third reading are not able to hear the bill because the deadline is past, it cannot be heard, which means it cannot be voted upon, which means it cannot pass to the second house, which means it cannot be voted upon there, nor go to the governor, nor become law.A bill is not "dead" until the final adjournment gavel is heard.
It may not have good chance but it is not dead.
Okay, say we do it your way. How do you get around the fact that the .gov when then be infringing a right?I know I'm going to get Flamed and Neg Repped for this but here goes.
I believe mandated Safety Classes would be beneficial but that goes for owning/using any item that can cause injury or death. I've seen a few idiots at Ranges wave loaded firearms at people and care less.
Wars have been started over words. Training should be mandatory before exercising your 1st amendment right. Do you agree?
Sorry, Will. Neither neg rep nor flames from me, but I completely disagree with you. I don't want any of my rights infringed at any time.
No tests, no limits, no "for the common good" hurdles to jump. For me, those things turn whatever action into a privileged, negating it as a right.
Cheers,
Spook
If the .gov tells me:I really don't see firearm rights being infringed on by a safety class of some kind. There's no harm in disagreeing about the issue.
I'm not saying it as an infringement. I can care less about someone owning a firearm. A free safety instruction booklet or video with a purchase of a firearm would probably be a good idea.
I really don't see firearm rights being infringed on by a safety class of some kind. There's no harm in disagreeing about the issue.
I'm not saying it as an infringement. I can care less about someone owning a firearm. A free safety instruction booklet or video with a purchase of a firearm would probably be a good idea.
I really don't see firearm rights being infringed on by a safety class of some kind.
Wars have been started over words. Training should be mandatory before exercising your 1st amendment right. Do you agree?
If something is potentially lethal safety and training courses should be must. As I've said before that just doesn't apply to firearms. Safety and training helps reduce the risk of someone getting hurt. Even if vehicles were in the Constitution I'd still safety and training is a must.