Russia proposed more than three years ago that Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad, could step down as part of a peace deal, according to a senior negotiator involved in back-channel discussions at the time.
Former Finnish president and Nobel peace prize laureate Martti Ahtisaari said western powers failed to seize on the proposal. Since it was made, in 2012, tens of thousands of people have been killed and millions uprooted, causing the world’s gravest refugee crisis since the second world war.
Sadly, I feel more confident that Russian involvement will be used to kill ISIS fighters than American involvement.
Wow. Did not see that coming, but it does make sense.
Just to throw in a little Bible prophecy, Ezekiel 38 & 39 mentions an alliance between Gog, Magog and Persia. Along with some other nations, they attack Israel. Most prophecy scholars will tell you Gog is the leader of the people of Magog. Magog is identified as Russia. Iran was called Persia until 1935. When I read the news article I posted, this was the first thing that came to my mind.
The US is seeking military talks with Russia on Syria, and hopes they could take place "very shortly", Secretary of State John Kerry has said.
The US and Russia differ sharply on Syria, and Washington has been concerned about Russia's increased military presence there.
"We're looking for ways in which to find a common ground," said Mr Kerry.
...
Arriving in London for talks with the UAE, Mr Kerry told reporters: "The president believes that military-to-military conversation is an important next step and hopefully will take place very shortly."
Well, that was a waste of money and time. Stupid planning on someone's part and a "strategy" that was doomed to fail from the start.
[h=1]Only 'Four or Five' US-trained Syrian Rebels Are Fighting in Syria, Pentagon Says[/h]
https://news.vice.com/article/only-...an-rebels-are-fighting-in-syria-pentagon-says
81% Of Syrians Believe US Is To Blame For ISIS | Zero Hedge
Keep that in mind when the president wants to invite 10,000 of them into the United States.
I think the case can reasonably be made that we are more than partially responsible for the rise of IS. We set everything in motion that led to them arising. They are our blowback for Iraq. We are responsible for driving the sunni remnants of Saddam's armed forces into their ranks by not allowing them a place in the new Iraq. I'd say those Syrians have a pretty decent grasp of what's happened.