Russia vs. Ukraine Part 2

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Wolfhound

    Hired Goon
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    48   0   0
    Apr 11, 2011
    4,117
    149
    Henry County
    You see any serious investigation being made into who is culpable?

    I find it amusing that you think proof will ever be obtained about a covert military operation
    Then all we are left with is theories right? Could the US have done it? Yes. Could Russia have done it? Yes.

    Sweden did an investigation and isn’t revealing what was found. Lots of theories about that also.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,406
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Misdirection. US blew up Nordstream. Just see Biden say himself what he was going to do. US was involved. Who planted the bombs? Who fired the missile? Who pushed the button? Who cares. US was in charge of operation. Just ask Biden.
    Word is, US put the bombs there. Norway hit the button
     

    Wolfhound

    Hired Goon
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    48   0   0
    Apr 11, 2011
    4,117
    149
    Henry County
    No. Joe Biden said so. Did you watch the video? Open your eyes. Do you live in your moms basement?
    I watched it. My eyes are open. I did not hear him say the US blew up the pipeline. Did you?

    Edit: What it does do is give more credibility to the theory that the US did it. I have to admit that.
     
    Last edited:

    nra4ever

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Dec 19, 2011
    2,374
    83
    Indy
    Well well. Look who is going to broker a peace deal and save the world. change is a coming and in the long run it’s not good for us.

     

    Brad69

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 16, 2016
    5,614
    77
    Perry county
    Fact any western country with a deep sea Navy could have blew it up.

    So if the Democratic freedom loving people of Ukraine. Broker a peace deal with China as the “middle” guy. Then accepts aid from China to rebuild.

    We could end up with Chinese base in Ukraine?
     
    Last edited:

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,362
    113
    Merrillville
    How did we go from China selling weapons to Russia to China trying to broker a peace deal? Isn't peace what everybody wants? I don't see Russia agreeing to anything.
    Maybe.
    But they could look at this as a ... we have no way to pull out without looking MORE like clowns, but now we can say the Chinese convinced us and made offers...


    Or not.
    dunno
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,362
    113
    Merrillville
    Maybe.
    But they could look at this as a ... we have no way to pull out without looking MORE like clowns, but now we can say the Chinese convinced us and made offers...


    Or not.
    dunno
    And then China ALSO gains from this, by looking like the 'peacemaker', on a world wide stage.
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,362
    113
    Merrillville
    Sure they do.

    The Japs were left to attack Pearl. Not a surprise.

    State needed a way to "convince" folks to go to a war they did not want.

    It worked then. It works now.
    Having studied many many many studies on it, and looking at BOTH arguments, I call B.S.
    Stopping the attack short of the actual attack would have accomplished the SAME RESULTS.
    Except we wouldn't have started with a decimated navy.

    And a list of hundred other reasons.

    I actually have a 2 book set right in front of me, discusses both sides.


    Basically, you had the US, that COULD NOT imagine those weak, short sighted Japs as attacking us, and winning.
    So the Navy wasn't taking it serious.
    Then, they assumed being in port, defense would be up to the army.
    The army assumed the navy could handle defense.
    everyone assumed it would be saboteurs,
    Everyone assumed the 'japs' were flying inferior planes
    etc.
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    20,942
    149
    1,000 yards out
    Maybe.
    But they could look at this as a ... we have no way to pull out without looking MORE like clowns, but now we can say the Chinese convinced us and made offers...


    Or not.
    dunno

    It's what happens when you have a bunch of clowns trying to do adult work.

    But hey, at least we've got more lesbians, bisexuals, gays, transvestites, queers, and whatever the hell else they are in the show than the other folks. You cannot say this clown show does not lead in some races!
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,362
    113
    Merrillville
    It's what happens when you have a bunch of clowns trying to do adult work.

    But hey, at least we've got more lesbians, bisexuals, gays, transvestites, queers, and whatever the hell else they are in the show than the other folks. You cannot say this clown show does not lead in some races!
    :)


    I also remember when I was in, NO ONE could attack the US, or the US Navy.
    Then the Stark was hit by a missile.
    Then Samuel B Roberts hit a mine.

    When people talk about 'our side', and what it does, or intends, they often forget that the 'other side' has a vote in it also.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom