As do we all. That is why I am here, to learn.You have loads to read and learn sir.
Loads...
As do we all. That is why I am here, to learn.You have loads to read and learn sir.
Loads...
He's talking about ATF Forms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6A, 9, 10. Did I miss any?No. I presume you are referring to form 4473, the Firearms Transaction Record. I have not gone through this process myself.
I have used firearms for sport shooting with friends and always borrowed from them. My feeling is that if I am going to represent Americans in public office I need to know (and if possible, personally experience) as much as I can about everything that impacts Americans.
So I better head to an FFL and buy something then.
220 221, whatever it takes.He's talking about ATF Forms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6A, 9, 10. Did I miss any?
220 221, whatever it takes.
I would guess so.Doesn't INGO have a few gun manufacturers licensees?
Vapor....As do we all. That is why I am here, to learn.
So what book would you recommend I start with?Vapor....
For starters the, 1934 and the 1968 Gun Control Acts.So what book would you recommend I start with?
For starters the, 1934 and the 1968 Gun Control Acts.
I dont have any questions with either one, I've been dealing with it for 40 years.
Oh grasshopper, you have much to learn.No. I presume you are referring to form 4473, the Firearms Transaction Record. I have not gone through this process myself.
I have used firearms for sport shooting with friends and always borrowed from them. My feeling is that if I am going to represent Americans in public office I need to know (and if possible, personally experience) as much as I can about everything that impacts Americans.
So I better head to an FFL and buy something then.
I don't know if you missed any.He's talking about ATF Forms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6A, 9, 10. Did I miss any?
I don't know if you missed any.
Here is a link to Form 1, which I have now reviewed. This form is consistent with Title 26 U.S.C., Chapter 53. I suppose I could review the rest of the forms if you like, but I imagine you're looking for my opinion on these forms, the ATF, and firearms laws in general, which I will expand upon in subsequent posts here.
I do not believe eliminating these acts will be an effective strategy to address the gap between American's views on firearms and the current activities of the federal government. That gap must be addressed, and I will get to that in a subsequent comment.What are your plans to eliminate both 1934 and 1968 Acts?
Again, do you have specific questions? I read the 1934 Act (again) at your request. I looked up a form, at the request of another forum member. If you just want to give me a reading list and have me acknowledge that I've read them, I'll do that.View attachment 354371
Yea, that's like the third line on the top of the form.
If elected what will you do for gun owners in Indiana? Nationally as well.
Much obliged. It's also worth pointing out that as a future member of the House of Representatives, I need to be educated on a huge variety of topics from healthcare to education to foreign policy to military affairs to taxation to space exploration and so on. I care about the issues your members are discussing here, but I will never have the opportunity to spend as much time on them as you all have.Just a word of advice @robbyslaughter, some here are gun rights activists in their free time, some hew study gun laws either for work and/or leisure, some here literally helped get Constitutional Carry passed and hang out at the state Capitol Building during the legislative sessions, some literally helped write Indiana gun policy. Some have been in the gun community longer for more than half a century. Don't feel discouraged when we challenge you, because some here really do know what they are talking about when it comes to gun laws and procedures.
I'll start with, as unconstitutional as these gun laws are, its a massive encroachment and they need to go away. Now, we have actually expanded gun Rights across America in the past 2-4 decades.I do not believe eliminating these acts will be an effective strategy to address the gap between American's views on firearms and the current activities of the federal government. That gap must be addressed, and I will get to that in a subsequent comment.
I am not familiar with this issue, so I would have to do some reading. But generally speaking, taxes are an awfully archaic way for governments to raise funds and I am support of finding ways to reduce or eliminate them.Tell us what your feelings are with the Pittman Robertson tax that Sportsman pay up to an 11% Federal tax? Do other Rights come with a separate Tax like Pittman Robertson or a $200.00 NFA tax stamp? that one has to pay for each NFA Transfer.