Right to Work Bill

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • jblomenberg16

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    67   0   0
    Mar 13, 2008
    9,920
    63
    Southern Indiana
    Prevailing wage will plummet. Then everyone will need to work 60hrs a week for a decent pay. Hell lets just throw any OT rates out the window. I admit there is bad things about organized labor.


    I think you'll find that prevailing wage won't plumment. In many exempt roles, prevailing wage actuallys stedily increases as the collective labor pool gets more competitive. Employers can then use their wage as a way to hire who they want.

    If they want a highly skilled and highly trained person, they'll offer a high wage, and carefully interview and select. If they need less training, they might offer less money.

    In many exempt cases OT is still offered as a premium over the standard wage. OT premium isn't just a union thing.
     

    Bapak2ja

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 17, 2009
    4,580
    48
    Fort Wayne
    I am definitely for the right to work, but there needs to be other changes within the National Labor Relation Act and Board, along with union structure, to better determine how workers' rights AND employer rights are addressed. Right now, there are too many people taking advantage of their unions when they are in need, although they don't pay dues. Also, the unions, in some instances, totally ignore some workers when they are in need, even though they are dues-paying members. On the other hand, I am not in agreement with any form of union-busting tactics that some employers have attempted to use in the past, so some protections will need to stay in place.

    The bottom line is, this needs to be dealt with in the legislature and just because any particular side happens to be in the minority, that does not give them the right to walk away from the table. If there is a proper argument, a statesman should be able to convey the benefits to his colleagues in a way to sway them to his side, regardless which side of the aisle the sit. The art of debate is nonexistent today, because of staunch party lines and politics.

    Excellent statement.
     

    gvbcraig

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    34   0   0
    Jul 10, 2009
    541
    43
    Southwest Fort Wayne
    Maybe I should of just kept my mouth shut. Nobody is forcing to pay anybody. The unions will be crushed if bills like this pass across the country. Then it will be every man for themselves. You stand where you stand, and I'll be over here. I'm not gonna play the debate game.

    I am in the construction industry, I am in a position to hire contractors and their subs. I have see good and bad on both sides and there are certain trades that I would prefer particular contractors period and it varies from project to project.

    I represent those who are paying for the labor and materials, why should we not have choice of who we want to hire.

    Everyone gets a chance to bid the work, if they quality...that is the key..if they qualify.

    What has gotten to me in the past is the attitudes of union labor. They get in your face, they create obstructions, they create tension on a project that has both open show and union labor. I take it as personal insult when one of my projects gets shut down because of a labor dispute, you got a beef with management, go talk to them, but don't shut me down.

    I do not have those issues with open shops, and the quality of work does not suffer, they are more of a team player.

    As far as every man for himself....isn't that what this country is all about. Stand up for yourself, I have all of my life, sometimes you get kicked in the face and you use that as learning experience.:twocents:
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,559
    149
    Napganistan
    I didn't realize the republicans have done that too. What was the issue when they refused to show?
    I heard the news mention it last year when the Dems ran out of state. I do believe it was some time ago. I tried Google it but there are a million posts for the current BS that is going on so it will be hard to find.
     

    dhnorris

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Apr 15, 2009
    775
    18
    hidden in a wall of mud
    I heard the news mention it last year when the Dems ran out of state. I do believe it was some time ago. I tried Google it but there are a million posts for the current BS that is going on so it will be hard to find.
    I don't know when the the repulicans did it but, I seem to remember that no-good will of the majority blocking whig who jumped out a window so they wouldn't have a quorum in 1839...............................................


    Abe Lincoln of Illinois
     

    DRob

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Aug 2, 2008
    5,905
    83
    Southside of Indy
    Union pals

    I have several buddies who are retired UAW guys. To a man, they will tell you the only people the unions helped were the deadbeats and the union officials. That would currently be deadbeats by the bus load, no doubt!
     

    9lock

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 4, 2010
    274
    16
    Classified
    I would like to see the right wing fascist's crushed for spitting on the soldiers graves "past and present" who paid dearly for such FREEDOMS.
     

    Stschil

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 24, 2010
    5,995
    63
    At the edge of sanit
    Prevailing wage will plummet. Then everyone will need to work 60hrs a week for a decent pay. Hell lets just throw any OT rates out the window. I admit there is bad things about organized labor.

    Prevailing wage???? What exactly is that?

    I've dealt with many unions in many different situations.
    One instance, I was FORCED, ie told that if union labor didnt do the unloading, the police would be called and I would be escorted from the convention hall, to have a union forklift driver unload my truck and paid approx 3 times what it would have cost me to have my own employees do it and it too twice as long.
    I have heard too many UAW workers complain that they were CALLED BACK to work. Seems that with their sub-pay and unemployment they were only making about $100 less than when they were at the plant.
     

    tlkidd

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 10, 2011
    57
    6
    New Haven
    My daughter asked me about how unions work. I told her to imagine that I am a potential employer and I want to hire you. This is a very good job but you have to pay your sister $100 every month or I have to fire you. I did not pick the $100 figure arbitrarily. That is what I pay each month. I can't say I would withdraw from my union but I should certainly have that option. Give me options. I can decide.
     

    mike8170

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 18, 2008
    1,880
    63
    Hiding from reality
    How does one determine that a job is a union job? How does the union get ownership of that work?

    I generally have no problems with organized labor. There are benefits, such as the training and qualifications you cited, and the union worker also benefits from a collective voice during wage and working conditions. I manage a few Union guys who are some of the hardest workers in our factory.

    Unfortunately there are also abuses of the Union and it can be used as a ring of defense to defend poor performance and poor behavior.


    The modern day Labor unions needs to rethink their business model. If done right, it can offer a comparitive advantage (refrerence to the training, certifications, etc.) but it must be willing to work in a competitive bidding environment vs. and entitlement environment. The right to work bill is one way that the state can help promote a healthy competition in the labor pool.

    In the trades, any contractor can bid on the work, just a certain wage obligations are set out in the specs of the project which must be met; usually it is prevailing wage. What it comes down to is that most non-union contractors are too small to man the work, and don't have the equipment or supplies. For example, no one can compete with Wilhelm when it comes to the big concrete jobs around Indy. They have the shop support, the gang forms, and equipment to get the job done.

    I really get irritated with people that claim I, as a union carpenter, make too much money, when I work around non-union guys that make the about the same as I do. The difference is they get vacation time, sick days, comp. time, etc. I get none of that, but I do have benefits that I can depend on, no matter which contractor I am working for.

    There are good non-union outfits out there, but there are a ton of crappy ones.
     
    Rating - 100%
    42   0   0
    Apr 14, 2011
    907
    18
    Reality
    I took this pic on my way to lunch as I drove past Laborers union local 120. I counted over 14 buses in the pictured parking lot and 2 more in the union hall parking lot.

    Regardless of your thoughts on the right to work, the unions are taking it serious and throwing a lot of money and man power behind it.

    IMG_20120105_114402-1.jpg


    I am for the right to work bill to be passed. (just want to include my opinion at the end.)

    Given that unions have essentially become money laundering mechanisms for the democrats, I'm not surprised that the unions will fight this hard...
     

    jblomenberg16

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    67   0   0
    Mar 13, 2008
    9,920
    63
    Southern Indiana
    In the trades, any contractor can bid on the work, just a certain wage obligations are set out in the specs of the project which must be met; usually it is prevailing wage. What it comes down to is that most non-union contractors are too small to man the work, and don't have the equipment or supplies. For example, no one can compete with Wilhelm when it comes to the big concrete jobs around Indy. They have the shop support, the gang forms, and equipment to get the job done.

    I really get irritated with people that claim I, as a union carpenter, make too much money, when I work around non-union guys that make the about the same as I do. The difference is they get vacation time, sick days, comp. time, etc. I get none of that, but I do have benefits that I can depend on, no matter which contractor I am working for.

    There are good non-union outfits out there, but there are a ton of crappy ones.


    Mike-

    Hope you didn't misunderstand my post...I wasn't saying that the prevailing wage was too high, just that I don't think it would drop if a right to work bill was passed. As you say, in a competitive bid, the best equipped to do the job will typically get it. Many companies can and will charge a premium for having the best tools and capabilities for the job, and I think that would only continue to support a good relatioship of payment for quality of work.
     

    PistolBob

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Oct 6, 2010
    5,440
    83
    Midwest US
    As a union electrician I am against the bill. Union jobs need to stay union.


    You need to go read the legislation. It's won't destroy labor unions, it just won't make it mandatory to join one. Why should ANYONE be forced to pay dues to a labor union they don't want to belong to?
     
    Top Bottom