Should I make a "hit piece" on Obama's record too?On a side note: where's the hit piece on Romney? He actually won Iowa.
Actually I might be able to combine my research on Romney & Obama since they are on the same side of most issues.
Should I make a "hit piece" on Obama's record too?On a side note: where's the hit piece on Romney? He actually won Iowa.
Yeah, not sure where that got attributed to Santorum.
Also, Dr. Paul was referring to the pick and choose method by which the incorporation doctrine was being used.
He got his ass handed to him by a guy who couldn't get out of single digits in the polls but beat him in the Caucus.All 3 got 6 delegates each hows that his ass on a platter???
No, he rejected incorporation entirely, calling it "phony"
The only one left to be incorporated is the 3rd....but I don't see many test case being brought on that anytime soon.
Ron Paul, "Mr. Constitution" doesn't believe any of the bill of rights applies to the states. That pesky 14th amendment thing can be ingored. Doesn't mean anything.
Libertarian my posterior.
I would classify Paul as more of a neoconfederate than a modern libertarian, for what its worth.
No, he rejected incorporation entirely, calling it "phony"
The only one left to be incorporated is the 3rd....but I don't see many test case being brought on that anytime soon.
Ron Paul, "Mr. Constitution" doesn't believe any of the bill of rights applies to the states. That pesky 14th amendment thing can be ingored. Doesn't mean anything.
Libertarian my posterior.
IMOOh, so you were just trolling with your misquote?
ETA: If you want to debate the incorporation doctrine, you should start another thread. It is a complex topic and it does not necessarily conflict with libertarian thought. That said, Ron Paul's complete views on the subject are not really available. His statements on the Kelo case are not comprehensive.
I would classify Paul as more of a neoconfederate than a modern libertarian, for what its worth. That conversation invariably leads to civil rights/slavery, though.
Oh, so you were just trolling with your misquote?
ETA: If you want to debate the incorporation doctrine, you should start another thread. It is a complex topic and it does not necessarily conflict with libertarian thought. That said, Ron Paul's complete views on the subject are not really available. His statements on the Kelo case are not comprehensive.
IMO
Calling people trolls is like using the "N" word.
It denotes a narrow minded view of the world and a distinct lack of tolerance for the views of others.
Carry on..
Hold your horses? It is not acceptable to call people out for trolling.
So you claim that you are being factual when you call another member a troll???^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^
YUP!
Don't let the facts get in your way.
Wouldn't that make Paul a neocon?
This is rich...........
You completely ignore Santorum until he comes from behind with single digit poll results and hands Ron Paul his ass on a platter in the Iowa Caucus.
Ron Paul, "Mr. Constitution"
Since this is Ron Paul's statement, not Santorum's, you admit that you find Paul "frightening" and "unacceptable."
(Can't wait to see the excuse making and back-peddalling on this one.)
Wouldn't that make Paul a neocon?
Hold your horses? It is not acceptable to call people out for trolling.
Apparently this is the case....Sure it is. But only when I do it.
So you claim that you are being factual when you call another member a troll???
I must have missed the post where Fenway appointed you the Troll Police...
Got a link???