Proof that LAPD intentionally set the fire (video)

[popsmoke]

[ame]http://youtu.be/SCdqybEfy9w[/ame]

From the tanscript:
“we’re going to go, uh... we’re gonna forward with the plan, with the... with the burner”


“wanted to... like we talked about”


“burn it”


“copy seven burners deployed and we have a fire”

 

[popsmoke]

I can't even comprehend the scope of this...

 

[public servant]

What's your point? If they broadcast it over a radio I don't think they were attempting to hide the fact.

Burn him out to the rear. He either comes out waving a white flag or goes out in a blaze of glory.

**** him.

 

[jsharmon7]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g[/ame]

 

[public servant]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g

 

[Avar]

Thanks for the post. It will be interesting what the media reports tomorrow.

 

[popsmoke]

What's your point? If they broadcast it over a radio I don't think they were attempting to hide the fact.

Burn him out to the rear. He either comes out waving a white flag or out in a blaze of glory.

**** him.

My point is that they weren't even sure it was him in the ****ing building. And there's a thing called due process. Burning a man alive ain't it.

 

[public servant]

My point is that they weren't even sure it was him in the ****ing building. And there's a thing called due process. Burning a man alive ain't it.

They appealed to him to end this multiple times. He chose poorly.

 

[IndyDave1776]

**** him.

I would say the same for the morons who opened fire on the two women delivering papers and attacked the guy on the highway.

 

[public servant]

I would say the same for the morons who opened fire on the two women delivering papers and attacked the guy on the highway.

And you have multiple times. And no one has disagreed with you.

 

[IndyDave1776]

And you have multiple times. And no one has disagreed with you.

I have noticed a conspicuous shortage of ideas on a meaningful solution for this problem, as opposed to plenty for Dorner, all of which included assorted methods by which he may become dead.

 

[Colt556]

I posted in this thread before it was locked......

 

[Kutnupe14]

My point is that they weren't even sure it was him in the ****ing building. And there's a thing called due process. Burning a man alive ain't it.

Due process when a guy is shooting at you (makes ZERO difference who it is)...

Pour flammable liquid in a bottle.... place cloth rag at opening of bottle... yell to, guy shooting at you, to give up, and let the legal system handle the crimes he is accused of committing.... listen.... listen some more.... ***crickets....chirp.... chirp....*** if more bullets come flying your way... light cloth rag with flame.... throw in bad guy's general direction....

...and end the threat.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I have noticed a conspicuous shortage of ideas on a meaningful solution for this problem, as opposed to plenty for Dorner, all of which included assorted methods by which he may become dead.

I said in another thread they should be arrested for crimnal recklessness, or manslaughter if they actually killed someone. They were obviously geeked up, and poorly trained.

 

[public servant]

I have noticed a conspicuous shortage of ideas on a meaningful solution for this problem, as opposed to plenty for Dorner, all of which included assorted methods by which he may become dead.

I've openly stated several times the actions of those officers were wrong and should be punished.

All I hear from you is they should suffer the same demise Dorner.

 

[Tdcompton]

He killed innocent people and two Law Enforcement Officers... Let him burn.. It's too bad the coward shot himself first.

 

[public servant]

I said in another thread they should be arrested for crimnal recklessness, or manslaughter if they actually killed someone. They were obviously geeked up, and poorly trained.

It's becoming more and more evident that IndyDave merely has an axe to grind. I don't believe he's capable of seeing past his jaded view. And that's not a slam, actually it's a damn shame.

It is hardly a secret that my general opinion of police based on personal experience is pretty low

 

[IndyDave1776]

It's becoming more and more evident that IndyDave merely has an axe to grind. I don't believe he's capable of seeing past his jaded view. And that's not a slam, actually it's a damn shame.

I wouldn't call it an axe to grind, but rather cumulative experience indicating a certain aggregate of people to be less than trustworthy and dangerous to liberty. I can't help the fact that the results are what they are. I can understand that anyone would tend to identify with their own group. I would also consider it reasonable to expect that a good/honest/honorable officer is probably accustomed to working with others of similar character. Based on my observation of corrupt departments in which good officers don't last long, I consider it reasonable to believe that the opposite is true--that corrupt officers would be squeezed out of honest departments.

What I consider to be a damned shame is that I am left with observations that form the foundation of my conclusions. My jaded view will change when the police cease to be a greater threat to my well-being than the criminals, and not until then.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I wouldn't call it an axe to grind, but rather cumulative experience indicating a certain aggregate of people to be less than trustworthy and dangerous to liberty. I can't help the fact that the results are what they are. I can understand that anyone would tend to identify with their own group. I would also consider it reasonable to expect that a good/honest/honorable officer is probably accustomed to working with others of similar character. Based on my observation of corrupt departments in which good officers don't last long, I consider it reasonable to believe that the opposite is true--that corrupt officers would be squeezed out of honest departments.

What I consider to be a damned shame is that I am left with observations that form the foundation of my conclusions. My jaded view will change when the police cease to be a greater threat to my well-being than the criminals, and not until then.

Ooooh, new thread idea. And this one might be worse than the "Founding Fathers" one.... ya'll game?

 

[Benny]

My point is that they weren't even sure it was him in the ****ing building. And there's a thing called due process. Burning a man alive ain't it.

I would say that due process goes right out the window if they were in a shoot out with him, but what I don't like at all is that unless they had x ray vision, they'd have had no way of knowing if there was a hostage in there with him when they set the place on fire.

I know "officer safety" and all that, but damn.