HeadlessRoland
Shooter
Willing to bet that the fact that people were willing to actually confront Piers, and humiliate him on air, is why he's now changing his act. Possible that he's finally realizing that he's barking up the wrong tree, and that he is in a minority.
The anti-gun crowd, I can understand and can see their perspective on the matter. It's a thing of wanting to see this tactful looking society without weapons of any kind, it's a fairytale but it's what they believe they are trying to accomplish. They don't understand crime in the slightest, but simply use it to shame who ever disagrees with them.
The biggest glaring thing I see that any anti-gunner with half a brain should understand, is that these upper end rifles aren't cheap common street thug tools. Most have many thousands of dollars put into them. They are at the lowest possible risk of anything for being involved in a crime. Where as the weapons the anti-gunners are alright with, generally, are typically the ones most often used in crimes.
Makes me want to beat my head against a wall at times over the lack of any real intelligence on the other side of the fence. It's nearly impossible to have a realistic and civil discussion.
It doesn't matter what types of guns are used in what types of crimes, it does not mean we shouldn't be allowed to possess them. All weaponry is mandated. There is no red line or restrictions upon the word 'arms,' which extends well beyond firearms.
You are right, though. It is very difficult to get a response from someone who supports tyranny who utilizes logic or reason. It's almost perpetually appeal to emotion, which has no bearing on the situation.