Democrats are panicking over retired Supreme Court Justice John Stevens’ comments on repealing the Second Amendment.
You know they’re panicking when they insist they’re not panicking.
Of course they're in a bind, because now their end goal, the removal of the 2A, has been laid bare.
We need this guy and more like him in Washington.
We need this guy and more like him in Washington.
Has about an equal chance of coming to pass as repealing the 2nd Amendment.
You are absolutely right. Actually following the Constitution is so 18th century in the minds of far too many.
Has about an equal chance of coming to pass as repealing the 2nd Amendment.
To change the Constitution we need 2/3 of The House, 2/3 of the Senate, and 3/4 of the States?
That was my point; that changing a law does not meet the same standard as changing the Constitution.FTFY
It is much simpler to change a law.
It is an obstacle in their way. The protections given have slowly eroded away as each President has built upon the previous ones.I think the idea of following the Constitution ended right after the ink dried. It literally, was "a good idea on paper,"... then those who craved power were like "I think those were more suggestions than directives."
To change a law we need 2/3 of The House, 2/3 of the Senate, and 3/4 of the States?
So it is more likely we would get the NFA repealed than the 2A based on the requirements to overturn a law vs. amend the 2ARight, as clarified by BF
By that very narrow definition, sure.So it is more likely we would get the NFA repealed than the 2A based on the requirements to overturn a law vs. amend the 2A