Newt or Mitt if you had to decide.

[jbombelli]

Absolutely. And the time and place to this in during the primaries and mid-year elections. And Presidential elections that don't have the ability to dramatically alter the very makeup of our country for the next several generations at least. The outcome could make this country unlivable for serious liberty minded individuals and take more years than I have left to fix. That is the problem here. Any point in history other than one like this I would agree with you. Just not now. I couldn't in good conscience do it to my kids. I love them and their chances at a life of liberty and happiness too much. I will not vote in a way that my actions will give the Libs to opportunity to take that away from my kids, friends and family. EVER !!!

If nothing else, I have to live by my beliefs and not sell them out for convenience. I sold them out for too many years and it's only gotten worse as time has gone by. If taking a stand at the ballot box for what I believe in hastens our downfall then so be it. I'm okay with that.

 

[ATM]

...I wonder what Einstein would have to say about those individuals.

He'd probably say, "It is the duty of every citizen according to his best capacities to give validity to his convictions in political affairs."

 

[LotsofGlocks]

Couldnt vote for either of those scumbags! I'd have to vote 3rd party of write in!

 

[rambone]

 

[MilitaryArms]

Mickey Mouse.

Why? Because Romney and Newt are liberal, globalist, tax, borrow and spend leftists that I can not in good faith support at any level.

I'll write in Paul or I'll abstain. I'm not sure which, but what I do know is that I can't support liberals with R's in front of their names any longer.