Call me crazy, but doesn't the dash seem to be hiding the action? Most people filming the cops stand in plain sight. I just don't buy it.
As to standing up to tyranny...depends on the definition of tyranny. There is a point, but assuming this video is real (and I don't think it is) this guy is getting a few whacks for being a dumbass. I don't think that it's tyranny.
You really are OK with the cops "giving someone a few whacks" because the cops think he's being a dumbass? really? Huh. I don't know what to say.
While I agree that at times it seems "the stupid shall inherit the earth"...I wouldn't beat them just because they grab just my ankle. Would they get sprayed? Possibly if they don't let go.You're not really getting the gist of what I said, but I don't really care. We've gotten away from the practice of handing out beatings to those who deserve them. Personally, I think it's made us weaker as a people.
My definition of a "dumbass" is someone who is unable to process their current predicament. If this cat got drunk, acted a fool to the extent that his buddy's couldn't handle him, then obviously there was a problem. If the story is true (and again, I don't think it is), then the guy was out of line and shouldn't be touching the police. If you grab a cops arm, leg, spit on them, lunge at them, or present a threat of any sort, then I'm sorry, they need to neutralize the situation. If some "dumbass" is too inebriated or foolish to recognize the danger of his behavior, then yes, I think a few whacks in order.
While I agree that at times it seems "the stupid shall inherit the earth"...I wouldn't beat them just because they grab just my ankle.
But spit on me? One of us will have a bad night...no matter what I do for a living. And before anyone accuses me of "getting even"...if you spit on me once...my reaction will only be so you cannot spit on me a second time.
Again...we're unable to see what all might be going on. So rendering a verdict is not possible...for me at least. Others will undoubtedly have their own opinion.
what happened before should have nothing to do with it. contempt of cop is no excuse for assault with a deadly weapon. if the victim (drunk) was in fact attacking then self defense is fine.The spray would have been a good idea, but hitting him more than once with the stick with the guy already on the ground seems a little much to me. But you cant see everything that went on before so who knows!
but dont listen to me. I use to pick fights with MP's just to stay amused. They never won and they had guns
You too! My top two priorities when on a 24 to 72 hr pass were always. #1 Get laid repeatedly! #2 Open a can of whoop a$$ on a few MP's just because I could!
What do you get when you send four MP's to get one drunk Ranger out of a bar? Four less beds available in the infirmary while the Ranger looks for one more piece of tail !
Surely not...As a former MP I'll have to say you are full of .