He was an off-duty cop working as a security guard. His name is Officer Dustin Ries.
Officer Dustin Ries did not get trained very well.
He was an off-duty cop working as a security guard. His name is Officer Dustin Ries.
your assuming I wouldnt have already shot him 3 times.
+1. I have lost all faith of anyone taking a principled stand against tyrannical law. It will creep up on us slowly. One checkpoint here, one banned item there. It is already happening.
This video is crazy. No matter what that kid said, it wasn't justified to beat him senseless with a baton and then make him suck down some pepper spray. A non-cop would never get away with a crazy assault like that over any exchange of words. Seriously, unbelievable. America is a scary place these days.
I would however, have written a report to CYA.
Really. We are still judging the encounter from a video that does not even show what the suspect was doing when the Officer was attempting to subdue him?
Me, the word tyranny, and traitor, have very specific, very strong meanings, and I won't use them lightly.
"The guy fell onto his chest and locked his arms around this officer's ankles and would not let go," Platke said."
So are you only appalled at people who believe in self-defense, or are you also appalled at seeing police brutality in action? This is a pretty brutal assault I'm seeing. Hit the guy in the right spot and you could seriously injure or kill him. Would you watch your wife be beat to a pulp over having a big mouth?
He's speculating. Just like everyone else...no matter what their take on it is...it's mere speculation.Can you say for sure that he's getting hit for having a big mouth? Do you have another angle where you can see the poor guy just laying there in the fetal position being beaten? Or are you picturing the part that you can't see to justify action?
Can you say for sure that he's getting hit for having a big mouth? Do you have another angle where you can see the poor guy just laying there in the fetal position being beaten? Or are you picturing the part that you can't see to justify action?