Mourdock Down Double Digits in New Poll

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,573
    113
    I didn't make up a list with old ladies names on it.

    No but I assume as a libertarian you are against social security, medicare, and medicaid.
    I assume you are against it because it spends your money.
    I assume you are a violent person because you accuse others of it all the time without evidence.
    I assume you do so because you are a violent person using misdirection.
    I assume this means you would push old ladies out in front of traffic.

    It fits all my assumptions, you are a lib who doesn't want your money spent on social programs with violent tendencies so I can at least ask you if you would.
     

    LPMan59

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 8, 2009
    5,560
    48
    South of Heaven
    i_like_where_this_is_going_7805.jpg
     

    hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    No but I assume as a libertarian you are against social security, medicare, and medicaid.
    I assume you are against it because it spends your money.
    I assume you are a violent person because you accuse others of it all the time without evidence.
    I assume you do so because you are a violent person using misdirection.
    I assume this means you would push old ladies out in front of traffic.

    It fits all my assumptions, you are a lib who doesn't want your money spent on social programs with violent tendencies so I can at least ask you if you would.

    You can assume whatever you want. Repubs preach about ending social programs all the time. That is until they actually gain power to do something about it. Once in power, they expand them.
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,573
    113
    You can assume whatever you want. Repubs preach about ending social programs all the time. That is until they actually gain power to do something about it. Once in power, they expand them.

    Umm

    You can assume whatever you want. Libertarians preach about ending social programs all the time. That is until they actually gain power to do something about it. Once in power, they expand them.
     

    Wild Deuce

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Dec 2, 2009
    4,947
    12
    How many of you people on here that are trashing Mourdock have ever actually talked to him? Actually listened to him speak, longer than a 3 second sound bite that the Dems pulled out of an entire speech and are running endlessly? Spent time with him? Have gotten to know him?
    I have, and I consider us fortunate if he gets elected. The man spoke his heart, that ALL life is a gift from God, from conception. No matter what manner it was conceived in, that Life is precious and had no choice in how it was brought into this world. He, of course, believes rape to be the horrible act that it is, however, the Jerry Springer-American Idol watching, bloodthirsty America is SO easily distracted from substance that they are oh-so-ready to believe whatever character-assassination trash is thrown in front of them. I am voting Mourdock and would consider this country lucky to have 99 more just like him in the Senate!
    Bread and circusses ........

    I couldn't have said it better. It's a sad day when even those amongst us can't see through a media hatchet job.

    This country ... this state ... will get the leaders they deserve.

    Idiots are for Murdock
    And yet, you can't even spell his name correctly...:D

    Now that's funny.
     

    edporch

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Oct 19, 2010
    4,770
    149
    Indianapolis
    I voted for Mourdock, as we need every Republican we can get in the Senate.

    If nothing else, a Republican run Senate is needed if we ever hope to repeal Obamacare.

    Regardless of his shortcomings, Mourdock is enough better than Lugar to pull me away from voting Libertarian, as I have for Senate elections since I can remember.
     
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 3, 2010
    819
    16
    In a cornfield
    Umm

    You can assume whatever you want. Libertarians preach about ending social programs all the time. That is until they actually gain power to do something about it. Once in power, they expand them.

    I know. Remember the last time a Libertarian was in charge.... We ended up with the PATRIOT Act, the TSA, No Child Left Behind, rapidly increasing national debt and by the time he left office we were on the verge of financial meltdown.
     

    hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    I know. Remember the last time a Libertarian was in charge.... We ended up with the PATRIOT Act, the TSA, No Child Left Behind, rapidly increasing national debt and by the time he left office we were on the verge of financial meltdown.

    You forgot the prescription drug benefit.


    Anyone want to bet a box of ammo that the federal deficit will be over $20 trillion January 2017 should Romney win?
     

    Hornett

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Sep 7, 2009
    2,580
    84
    Bedford, Indiana
    You can assume whatever you want. Repubs preach about ending social programs all the time. That is until they actually gain power to do something about it. Once in power, they expand them.
    This is very factual.
    However, under republican control, it expands more slowly than if the Dems stayed in power.
    This is the reason that people are so frustrated with the RNC.
    When we get control we never take any ground back.
    We just give up ground more slowly.
    Face it, the republicans are left of center.
    What we are arguing about in this thread is what to do about it.
    Give up on the RNC or fix it.
    IMO neither option is viable.
    So rather than give the Dems full control I vote for a Republican slow death with the possibility that we can slow socialism down enough to come up with a way to fix these problems.
     

    hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    This is very factual.
    However, under republican control, it expands more slowly than if the Dems stayed in power.
    This is the reason that people are so frustrated with the RNC.
    When we get control we never take any ground back.
    We just give up ground more slowly.
    Face it, the republicans are left of center.
    What we are arguing about in this thread is how to fix it.
    Give up on the RNC or fix it.
    IMO neither option is viable.
    So rather than give the Dems full control I vote for a Republican slow death with the possibility that we can slow socialism down enough to come up with a way to fix these problems.

    But many don't care so long as its their guy doing it. I used to make excuses for Bush's expanding government until I finally stood back and looked. If Romney wins, there'll be a sharp decrease in the amount of threads in this forum. Right now, if Obama farts, he's actually a chemical weapon designed to murder American soldiers. Romney won't do any wrong.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    52,057
    113
    Mitchell
    But many don't care so long as its their guy doing it. I used to make excuses for Bush's expanding government until I finally stood back and looked. If Romney wins, there'll be a sharp decrease in the amount of threads in this forum. Right now, if Obama farts, he's actually a chemical weapon designed to murder American soldiers. Romney won't do any wrong.

    Now come on. There will be plenty to keep us entertained. The "I told you so" threads alone will be certainly fill the void.
     

    hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    Now come on. There will be plenty to keep us entertained. The "I told you so" threads alone will be certainly fill the void.

    I'm sure there will be plenty of those threads. If there isn't an executive order issuing waivers for obamacare by January 22nd, there will be good cause for an I told you so.
     

    Solitaire

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Oct 8, 2012
    659
    16
    Indy
    I always get in trouble for this, but what the hell, here we go.
    Is this where we start the list of all who helped elect Donnelly, thus Harry Reid?

    Solitaire
    mrjarrell
    whipfinish
    BigMoose
    downzero
    CTS
    rwstahlh
    ...

    I made a list? But I'm new here! Gosh.....I feel so honored! :):

    I'd like to thank my parents, my high school physics teacher Mr. Vargas, the ladies from The View (except that stupid conservative one), Karl Marx, John Lennon, our beloved President, and the entire cast of the Jersey Shore.
    :rockwoot:

    Killing a baby is killing a baby no matter how you try to make it sound ok and that is what's deplorable. And BTW, if you believe in one type of murder you may as well believe in them all. Those of you willing to harm a child will suffer Gods judgement.

    Sure, and every time you rub one out, you commit genocide. :rolleyes:

    Your impotent threats have no power over me, as I don't participate in your little club. I'm not a bit surprised that you don't understand contraception or fetal development, as stupid things like facts and science have no place in a life based on a bronze age view of the world, tailor made just for you by one of hundreds of different interpretations of the same book.

    Go peddle your tripe somewhere else.
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom