Those are 100% black districts and the voters in those districts vote 100% along racial lines. Whites need not apply. I have no trouble believing that no votes for a white Republican were cast in those districts, and probably no votes for ANY Republican.
So then one could expect to see some precincts somewhere that have 0 BHO votes?
SEE BELOW \/
We all know, and there is no argument on this point, that anybody voting for obama is not very intelligent.
Now, assuming you are correct on every. single. person. voting in those areas were voting obama....... No one accidentally voted for Romney?
Not one?
You do realize you are coming off as a total douche right?
Just helpin a brother check himself.
I think it depends on your perspective. I guess facts and logic aren't the most popular things on a political forum that features unsubstantiated fraud allegations and a "drone strike" theory on the gas line explosion in Indianapolis that killed a grade school teacher and her husband.
Sorry if I hurt any feelings. There's nothing sadder than the tears of a clown.
Gas line? "Citizens Energy shut off gas to all the homes in the subdivision and investigated potential gas issues in the neighborhood. An official said the company had received no reports of an odor of gas in the area, and no gas leaks had been discovered as of early Sunday morning. Currently, 30 homes are without gas."
Home explosion kills two on south side | WISHTV.com - Indianapolis
Not to be rude, but your evidence and source please? Would love to see the facts you have to prove to us that this was a gas line explosion, since you must be 100% sure to ensure that you didn't make a statement based on unsubstanciated "facts". Glad you happen to know more than the rest of us. Second, this isn't a political forum (hence the title), a political section maybe, but it's a gun forum.
http://www.indystar.com/article/201...plosion?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|IndyStar.com
Suspected faulty furnace. A gas leak, most likely.
Wait, I thought this thread was about election fraud. What happened? Is this a thread jack?
Wait, I thought this thread was about election fraud. What happened? Is this a thread jack?
Mistaken votes? Is that a logical conclusion based on evidence, or is that the only logical conclusion you can come to, based on what you WANT to see? Voting for the person that you want to vote for is not particularly difficult. We see zero error rates in vastly more complicated tasks every day.
Show me the disaffected Romney voters, or go back to posting cute little pictures and GIFs.
I didn't see 100% turnout mentioned in the article, where did you get this information?
Now for the $50 question (once again): Given the nature of electronic voting, how in the universe do you conclusively prove or disprove the validity of the vote with no hard copy verified by the voter in each case?
One of the pro-Gore arguments in Florida in 2000 is that the poor dumb minorities were too f**king stupid to understand the ballot, so how is it unreasonable to doubt that every single person in that many precincts got it perfect?
Do Philly and Cleveland use the same ballots as Florida did in 2000? And is the implication that voters were too stupid to understand a ballot make it true? You are basing your "reasonableness" on a hysterical Democrat argument made during one of our nation's messiest and closest Presidential elections.
I disagreed with the Gore team, and thought that their argument was pure hysterics, much like unfounded allegations from any group.
What IS reasonable is that we should expect to hear from angry, outraged Romney voters in these precincts soon. Do you agree?